ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

David B.

Livingstone

 

 

Read David's bio and previous columns

 

March 19, 2009

R.I.P., Post-Intelligencer; At Least the Detroit News Will Probably Be Next

 

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has breathed its last – at least in the ink-on-paper form that its dwindling but avid readership had grown accustomed to. A few days ago, one of the United States’ few remaining two-newspaper towns suddenly became a one-newspaper town when the P-I’s parent corporate megalith, Hearst, pulled the plug on the Pacific Northwest’s 146-year-old standard bearer for quality traditional journalism, leaving the thoroughly revolting Seattle Times as that city’s sole printed daily source for “news” – if it can be called that anymore.

 

It hardly comes as a surprise. Newspapers, as beloved a tradition as they are, are on the fast track to oblivion in an era where “information” can be delivered instantaneously in a stream of electrons rather than by a flotilla of trucks carrying the folded corpses of thousands of trees. The typesetter and the beat reporter are destined to join the cooper, the alchemist and the blacksmith in irrelevancy, and by and large America will be the worse off for it.

 

It is too convenient, however, to blame the decline of the American newspaper solely upon the inexorable advance of communications technology. Historically, the emergence of new mediums has seldom resulted in the wholesale demise of their forebears (the fate of the telegraph notwithstanding). Cinema was supposed to have killed theater. Radio was supposed to have killed cinema. TV was supposed to have killed both radio and cinema, and videotapes were supposed to have killed TV. Generally speaking, it didn’t work out that way, although legacy media were forced to adapt in order to survive. This time, though, things stand to be a bit different.

 

Newspapers have failed to adapt – and when they’ve attempted to do so, they’ve generally done spectacularly poorly. Case in point: The Detroit News, likely the next metropolitan daily to follow the Post-Intelligencer to the gallows.

 

As newspapers go, the News has been a pale also-ran for most of its existence – the downscale, right-wing, subliterate stepsister of the marginally more sophisticated Free Press. A perennially-shrinking page count and circulation have been the News’s reward for a primordial editorial worldview and a propensity to both underestimate readers’ intelligence and overestimate their gullibility and appetite for inanities.

 

Like the majority of floundering dailies, the News’s malaise stems from a decades-long addiction to “market research”: “Focus groups” comprised of bored halfwits – the only strata of humanity who can be coaxed to sit around for an afternoon and answer inane market researchers’ questions – told the News and the other papers that they wanted more local news about their neighborhoods, more celebrity gossip, more saccharine special-interest drivel and fewer boring stories about complicated issues, distant events or scary foreign peoples – especially if these couldn’t be readily illustrated with four-color photographs and cartoony illustrations.

 

The News happily obliged.  

 

The result is the sad excuse for birdcage liner delivered to Detroit gas stations and convenience stores daily – a paper bereft of global perspective, virtually void of enterprise reporting, which seems to exist solely to reinforce the prejudices and presuppositions of a shrinking class of suburban robots fixated upon football, movie stars and sensationalism. At the News, yesterday’s paper is also tomorrow’s, is also last week’s and next month’s – a mouldering mélange of Britney Spears sightings, sports team bombast, auto industry propaganda and ads for “male enhancement” medications. In short, a crushing bore.

 

The News, like so many failed and failing papers before it, forgot that regardless of what the focus group inmates might report, people rely on newspapers to tell them what they don’t know, not what they do. The steady drumbeat of relentless familiarity offered by the focus group press, while perhaps reassuring at first, quickly grows boring. The steady stream of predigested celebrity and business press releases that pass for stories and the relentless lost-puppy localization in place of relevant reportage on significant events makes for a thin, unsatisfying gruel that will eventually leave even the dullest minds unsatisfied.

 

The News web site has lately been including a little box warning of coming changes, ostensibly to bring the paper into the 21st Century through a greater reliance on online delivery while maintaining what promises to be a downsized print publication. Similarly, the plucky Post-Intelligencer is still maintaining at least the pretense of continuing on as an online-only publication. Only unbridled optimism could afford either venture a long-term survival prospect exceeding that of a snowman in the Sahara. The struggle to save the dimetrodon dailies is akin to bailing out the Titanic with a teacup, and whether warranted (News) or tragic (Post-Intelligencer), the inevitable outcome remains inevitable. Hasta la vista, babies. 

    

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # DBL048. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause