February 19, 2009
GM & Chrysler: Saving the Unsaveable
So, we want to save the auto industry, do
we?
Evidently. As of the closing of this past
Tuesday’s news cycle, Chrysler LLC – the
hollowed husk of what once was the smallest
of the “Big Three” – was preparing to stick
its nose into the federal trough to the tune
of an additional $5 billion in government
dollars in one final Hail Mary attempt to
stave off the inevitable.
Of course, when trillion-dollar economic
rescue packages are being hurried into
existence in a similarly desperate attempt
to stop the entire American economy from
choking to death on its own bile, a paltry
$5 billion more or less doesn’t matter so
much. The temptation is to respond to
Chrysler’s entreaties with a grandiose and
cavalier assent, and maybe toss in an extra
buck or two so that it can buy itself an ice
cream cone.
Why not? After all, at this point we’re
spending imaginary money anyway, using the
illusion of wealth to prop up the illusion
of a thriving capitalist behemoth, all the
while hoping that the rest of the planet
doesn’t catch on to the shell game we’re
trying to pull off. But all of us know the
truth: There’s a big hollow nothingness at
the core of American economic might, a
vacuum where the country’s real wealth –
mineral, manufacturing, agricultural – used
to be. We’re faking, and the rest of the
world figures it’s in their own best
interest to let us get away with it.
Part of that faking involves pretending that
there’s a future not only for the American
manufacturing sector, but for that most
wasteful and destructive of objects that it
produces: The big, dumb American automobile.
It’s a sickness, I suppose: Like all
addictions, Americans’ compulsive worship
for and purchase of the smog-belching,
gas-wasting plastic and glass piles of crap
in which they spend 10 percent of their
lives either in gridlock or swearing up a
storm at the jerk that just cut them off
seems so ingrained as to be unshakeable.
Yes, we say: We are perfectly happy whilst
in the midst of bumper-to-bumper commutes
between our cookie-cutter suburban idylls
and our cubicles, and more than content to
shell out thousands of dollars in insurance
and lease payments annually for the
privilege. We also enjoy eating ground glass
and beating ourselves about the head with
claw hammers. Why do you ask?
Well, maybe there is – as the Ford
advertising slogan used to proclaim – a
better idea. Just maybe we could use
that $5 billion, not to mention the various
other keep-up-with-the-Joneses $5 billions
that GM and Ford are sure to ultimately
receive, for something a little bit smarter
than subsidizing the production of the next
Pinto or Corvair. Maybe we could reap the
benefits of an auto bailout – jobs saved,
vestigal manufacturing base preserved – by
fine-tuning our giveaways a little.
Those with really long memories might recall
that it was General Motors that was in large
measure responsible for the decimation of
urban mass transit in the United States
during the middle of the last century. GM
bought up trolley systems, streetcar
systems, subways and interurban rail lines
and unceremoniously closed them down, all in
the name of creating additional demand for
its miserable land-yacht automobiles.
Well, what GM (and Ford and Chrysler) taketh
away, they can bring back. If the “auto
companies” are so anxious to glom on to tens
of billions of tax dollars, maybe they
should be transformed into “transportation
companies” instead. Forget about cars. Focus
on light rail, bullet trains, buses and
other forms of mass transportation that
actually make economic and environmental
sense. Want those billions? Build us subways
and monorails, or go join AMC, DeLorean,
Packard and Duryea on history’s rusting
scrapheap where, by rights, you belong.
Think anyone in D.C.’s got the spine to
propose such an initiative? Of course not.
It makes sense. Instead, we’ll give Chrysler
their $5 billion so that they can pretend
not to be an anachronism for another five
years or so, even as the Chinese, the
Koreans and the Indians eat their lunch,
flooding the global market with
fuel-efficient, sub-$10,000 vehicles, while
an increasingly urbanized global population
turns in greater numbers toward foreign-made
mass transit when moving to and fro. But we
Americans, who always know better,
will still have our auto industry, just as
we have our coopers and our alchemists and
our blacksmiths.
And when one of those stupid, bloated Dodge
trucks nearly sideswipes us into a ditch
during our next interminable morning
commute, our chests can swell with pride in
the knowledge that our $5 billion paid for
it to exist.
©
2009 North Star Writers Group. May not
be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DBL044.
Request permission to publish here.