July 14, 2009
The Public Option Play: Insulting Our
Intelligence
Having conquered banking and autos, the Sun King –
Barack “I Won” Obama – and his
congressional cohort may well have their
hearts set on bringing health care under
what some wags are calling their “reign
of error.” After all, to the victors
goes the spoiling.
But must they also, as Michael Corleone put it to
Carlo Rizzi, “insult my intelligence” in
the process?
The dumbest of the veritable cornucopia of dumb
arguments being put forward by
proponents of the Obama health-care plan
involves the so-called “public option,”
a Medicare-like government plan that
would be offered in competition with
private insurance.
The opponents of the public option state the obvious:
You can’t fight City Hall, the House
(not to mention the Senate) always wins,
you don’t pick fights with people who
buy ink by the barrel, and you can’t
compete with a government entity.
In response, the fans of Obama’s l’etat grande
solution – thinking either that they are
cleverer by half than they are, or that
everyone else is 50 percent stupider –
attempt to turn conservatives’ faith in
free markets back on them.
Take the president’s own mocking last month of the
justifiable fears that have been
expressed about a government health-care
behemoth: "If private insurers say that
the marketplace provides the best
quality health care, then why is it that
the government, which they say can't run
anything, suddenly is going to drive
them out of business? That’s not
logical."
The erstwhile law professor must have been home sick
the day they taught logic. Because a
government program doesn’t have to be
well-run to crush any competitors in its
path. It can sweep them aside the way
the Sun King apparently plans to manage
all aspects of American life – by edict.
It’s always helpful, when running an enterprise of any
kind, to be able to regulate your
competitors – based, among other things,
on politically driven wish lists. “What?
Your plan doesn’t cover breast
augmentation for disadvantaged,
clinically depressed unemployed ‘sex
workers?’ Or sex-change operations for
left-handed, learning-disabled teenage
illegal immigrants? We’ll fix that!”
Even as you limit your own liability: “Grandma needs a
pacemaker? Too old. Leave her by the
side of the trail to die.”
It’s also fun and profitable not to have to worry
about such old-fashioned concerns
bedeviling private-sector businesses,
like making money. Costs going up too
fast for premiums to cover? No problem:
We’ll just print some more currency, or
shift the costs to those same
private-sector competitors, just as
Medicare does today.
Pricing?
We don't need no stinkin’ pricing!
Because the price of government health
care is whatever the government says it
is. Which, given the political pressures
that will come to bear, will likely be
lower than private plans. That is, until
there are no more private plans.
It’s ironic, in fact, that just as the Sun King’s
feudal lords are gearing up to become
the world’s largest monopoly health care
provider, they are also dusting off the
torture rack in the Justice Department’s
anti-trust department. The targets?
Airline alliances and, reportedly,
distribution deals between cell phone
manufacturers and telecom providers,
whom the feds charge with abuse of
market power.
Talk about insulting my intelligence. Under these
wireless marketing arrangements, the
United States market is the most
competitive anywhere in the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), with consumers enjoying the
lowest prices and using the most
minutes. As the Wall Street Journal
recently pointed out, iPhones have
plummeted in price from around $500 to
as little as $99. Meanwhile, the same
Journal reported this week that with
the economic downturn, it’s time to get
ready for – and stop me if you’ve heard
this one – yet another round of airline
bankruptcies.
But then again, as his designs on the health care
industry demonstrate, the Sun King knows
all about abuse of power. As they say:
Takes one to know one.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.