March 26, 2009
Wolfman Frank: Getting Government Right
You’re all getting a clue by now that
bad government is the bane of my
ill-tempered, dismal existence. And that
the worst of bad government involves my
sitting in traffic.
Here’s how I figure it: When I’m waiting
in a long line at the supermarket,
management opens another checkout lane.
But if I’m waiting in a long line of
cars trying to get somewhere (usually
late), what does government do? Open
another lane, you say? Silly you.
First, government blames me for driving
too much. Then it tries to raise my
taxes to finance local roads while
showering rural areas with revenues to
pave two-laned country byways with gold.
Then, when it finally decides to
construct a way around our traffic mess,
it battles a bevy of namby-pamby NIMBYs
for a decade and scuttles the project.
Exhibits A through Z: U.S. Interstate 66
linking Northern Virginia to Washington,
D.C. Four decades ago, I-66 was planned
to boast eight lanes in its final
approach to the District and from there
split into two highways, one leading to
a new Potomac River crossing.
Instead, in one of the most brain-dead
planning compromises ever (forced by –
surprise! – NIMBY legal challenges), the
bridge was halted and said approach was
scaled down to two measly lanes each
way, which were in turn restricted to
car pools during rush hour. I kid thee
not.
Of course, during non-rush hours, the
four-lane stretch is continually
clogged, with much of that backup
centered around one major exit in
Arlington. Crawling up to said exit, I
have often dreamed, “If only someone in
government would have the common sense
to lay down maybe half a mile of
asphalt, this whole nasty traffic mess
would be cleared.” As if.
So imagine the heart-stopping,
breath-halting shock when I read that
next year the government plans to lay
down a full one-and-a-half miles of
asphalt precisely where common sense
would dictate. Global warming?
Fugeddaboudit. A certain very hot place
was about to freeze over.
That is, until I learned who was behind
the widening project: one Frank R. Wolf
(R), U.S. Representative for the 10th
District of Virginia. You see, my man
Frank Wolf gets what government is meant
to be – a service provider to us, its
customers.
Wolfman Frank epitomizes smart and
responsive government, centered on
solving real problems while (mostly)
adhering to Republican principles. He’s
all about transportation – the 800-pound
gorilla facing his district – and
education, the next biggest concern.
Wolf has brought together regional
leaders to combat gang violence, a
plague spreading to the outermost
exurbs, has been that rare leader
questioning the pernicious effects of
gambling and is highlighting the dangers
of shipping Gitmo terrorists to the
mainland. His caseworkers are legendary
for their working knowledge of the
bureaucracy.
Meanwhile, the congressman has earned a
global reputation for his championing of
human and religious rights and his
tireless fight against trafficking in
women. He just called the O-ministration
on the carpet for Hillary Clinton’s
implication that snuggling up to China
would take precedence over combating
torture and “gendercide.”
OK, nobody’s perfect, and I’ll admit
that I gagged some when the Wolfman
caved on last week’s vote to cudgel AIG
bonus babies with the tax code. His
well-deserved reputation as an earmarker
also earned a primary challenge last
year (which he won, characteristically
sweating all the way, with 90-plus
percent of the vote).
But now he's even getting spending right
– limiting requests to transportation
and gangs. And with the Unholy
Obama/Reid/Pelosi Trinity blowing up the
budget even ahead of pending entitlement
disasters, the congressman has proposed
an independent “Securing America's
Future Economy (SAFE) Commission,”
charged with producing long-term
spending solutions and real tax reforms.
What are its chances of passing? When
you-know-where freezes over. In other
words, given Wolfman Frank’s ability to
get government right, just as they lay
those last few feet of asphalt on I-66.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.