March 24, 2009
Special Olympics vs. Macaca: D is for
Double Standard
What do I think about Barack Obama’s Special Olympics
gaffe? So glad you asked.
I would normally want to give Sleek Barry some love.
And agree with Tim Shriver – Kennedy
nephew and Special Olympics Chairman –
that he “didn’t
want to embarrass or give anybody any
more reason for pain or any kind of
suffering.”
And the Wall Street Journal is
saying that “the
real gutter ball goes to anyone trying
to score political points off the
remark.” Even Washington Post
White House correspondent Michael A.
Fletcher agreed with an online
chatter’s comment that read, “People
misspeak sometimes. Apologize and move
on”
Yet deep down in my own Grinch-like,
two-sizes-too-small pundit’s heart, I
can’t help but contrast the kid-glove
treatment accorded Obama’s “misspeak”
with the brutalization of former
Virginia Sen. George Allen for his
equally light-hearted and brain-dead
“macaca” remark a couple years back. The
senator, too, apologized. It was more
like a virtual apology tour. Apologies
in a statement, and later in person, to
the young man he targeted. Apologies to
Indian-American groups. Apologies to the
public. (Unfortunately – not to actual
macacas – for linking them to
Democrats.)
Yet the media – especially the influential Post
– launched into high dudgeon, if not low
orbit. A page-one Post story
echoed charges that the comment was
“demeaning and insensitive,” as an
editorial hammered Allen for “bullying
your opponents and calling them strange
names” – the first of at least 45
articles, editorials and opinion pieces
on Allen’s indiscretion.
The Post’s coverage of Obama’s slip? One
light-hearted page-four treatment, along
with side mentions in an op-ed, blogs
and chats. Was the president’s comment
“demeaning and insensitive?” Why, no. It
was “not funny.” Duh.
It’s always helpful to have a squadron of Kennedys
providing air cover. Shriver’s sister
Maria and her Governator spouse also
leaped to the president’s defense.
More important, it helps not to have the Post
weave your goof into a larger
“narrative” of deep-down badness. To
drag out your alleged “fondness for
Confederate flags” and onetime
opposition to the King birthday holiday.
To foment dark suspicions that your
Tunisian Jewish mother planted the evil
“macaca” term deep in your brain. To
allege college-era use of the “N” word
and even portray a noose in a
Western-themed display in your office as
proof of latent racism.
In fairness, the Post’s coverage
of Obama’s faux pas did provide
some narrative context – bowling.
Plaintively asking if the president
could ever mention the subject again,
its piece linked the boner to his prior
bad luck on the lanes, including
twirling a 37 while campaigning in
Altoona.
As a public service, allow me to suggest an
alternative story line: Sleek Barry’s
blunder underscores that he is an
arrogant yet incompetent ingénue four
years removed from the Illinois state
senate, who when unscripted opens his
mouth largely to switch size-13 feet,
and who put an even more gaffe-prone
walking political punch line a heartbeat
from the presidency; who appointed a
team of tax evaders – one of whom
offered a next-generation bailout plan
that set Wall Street to snickering – and
who demagogued on the AIG bonuses after
having preserved them, thereby putting
future financial community cooperation
in jeopardy; who allowed Harry Reid and
Nancy Pelosi to stuff his inflationary
stimu-lust and omni-bust spending
packages with more pork than Bob Evans;
who would negotiate with murderous
madmen without pre-conditions and whose
administration is “resetting” relations
with a brutal despot who murders
defectors and journalists and recently
overran an ally (and symbolized the
policy shift by making a gift of “reset”
button labeled, in Russian,
“overcharge”).
And who pledged to redeploy forces to Afghanistan with
no clue how to win there and decided to
turn the lights out at Gitmo with no
plan to protect us from the death
merchants there.
Unquestionably, our president is sorry. And two months
after hearing him mangle the oath of
office, so am I.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.