February 2, 2009
Of Stoplights and Stimuli
Back in the day, when our family minivan would halt at
a traffic signal, our adorable blonde,
blue-eyed toddler Tonia would mutter
from her back-row car seat, “Stupid
light . . . stupid light.”
Chip off the old block. (Some would say “blockhead.”)
By definition (mine), all stoplights are stupid
lights. Driving is about going, not
stopping. In fact, stoplights – an
ill-considered holdover of the early
days of horseless carriages – are the
epitome of bad government.
There are too darn many of them, and too few
alternatives like rotaries and
cloverleafs designed to keep traffic
moving smoothly and safely. Too many
signals boast left-turn arrows, which
prolong waits. Timing? Hah!
Not to mention that all stoplights appear specially
designed to accomplish two things – turn
red when I approach, and turn green for
Tonia now that she has her license.
Nevertheless, I am not alone in seeing
red. Cost estimates of hours and fuel
lost to signals range to more than $120
billion a year. Studies cited by the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
have found that roundabouts can reduce
fuel consumption by 30 percent, vehicle
delays by up to 89 percent and accidents
by 40 percent. Even four-way stops are
safer and more efficient. As Mick
philosophized in Rocky II:
“Whadda we waitin’ fer?”
But to paraphrase George Orwell, while all stoplights
are equally stupid, some are more equal
than others. Exhibit A involves a major
intersection where the Commonwealth of
Virginia spent millions of dollars
building an overpass and cloverleaf,
along with two breathtaking flyovers.
Yet the engineering geniuses decided only to build
three “leafs” in their clover. Drivers
who want to head north must now stop and
wait for a left-turn arrow at a new
stoplight atop the overpass.
Every time I reach the red light and wait – with no
one approaching the other direction – I
watch with bemusement the cars stopped
at another light added down the road.
While I stew and burn gas, that light
will turn green, their drivers will race
to the overpass where I am helplessly
detained, and then the signal will
abruptly change, frustrating them for
absolutely no reason while finally
allowing me to proceed.
Naah-naah, nah naah-naah. Road rage city.
What set me off on this jeremiad? Why, of course, the
massive “stimulus” package now racing
down the road to your neighborhood.
In contemplating this Hummer of a plan, Barack Obama
assured his adoring public, “We
won’t do it the old Washington way.” His
Oneness also once pledged to
“go through the federal budget, line-by-line, eliminating programs that
no longer work and making the ones we do
need work better and cost less.”
Ah, the best-laid plans of stoplights and stimuli . .
.
The Obamulus bill at last count was at approximately
$850 billion and nearly 1,600 pages. To
put that into perspective, $850 billion
would fund 3,400 Bridges to Nowhere. So
think about how many stupid lights it
will finance.
One of America’s most educated and affluent populaces
couldn’t prevent local government from
installing a time-and-fuel-wasting
stoplight. What’s to stop them as cash
flows from Barry I’s neo-monarchy with
utterly no local accountability?
Trust me. No one is going line-by-line through the
1,600-page Obamulus bill eliminating
projects that won’t work. Nor will
anyone go through the literally tens of
millions of line items it will spawn at
the state and local level, including
thousands of stoplights that won’t work
either. They are too busy shoveling
money at “shovel-ready” projects.
There will be some stoplights to which I will want to
take a shovel. Maybe Tonia will help me.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.