January 12, 2009
Change and Marriage: We Can’t Have None
Without the Other
Love and marriage, love and marriage
Go together like the horse and carriage
Dad was told by Mother
You can't have one; you can't have none;
You can't have one without the other!
We all know exactly what the “none” refers to in this
standard by the incomparable Sammy Cahn,
as immortalized by Ol’ Blue Eyes. Ah,
the days of preserving virtue. But hold
that thought.
What occasions this lyrical walk down memory lane?
Why, it’s the release of another tome –
Guilty – by that conservative
fun-raiser Ann Coulter, complete with a
manufactured media crisis, this time
over her ostensible lifetime ban by NBC.
This was a ban revoked – following a day
of damsel-creating-da-stress interviews
that blazed across other outlets – just
in time for an especially testy joust
with Today’s visibly irritated
Matt Lauer.
I always enjoy the tortured cries and Romper Roomish
rumpuses (emphasis on Mr. Don’t Be) that
accompany the lithe Mouth of the Ouch’s
latest edition. But this time, I’m
concerned that all the public
pyrotechnics might obscure an
extraordinarily timely and important
message.
In the second chapter of her opus, the colorful Ms.
Coulter maintains that “(t)he most
worshipped figure in modern America is
the ‘single mother.” But also that
“single mothers cause irreparable harm
to other human beings – their own
children – as countless studies on the
subject make clear . . . (T)hey also
foist a raft of social pathologies on
society. Look at almost any societal
problem and you will find it is really a
problem of single mothers.” Ouch,
indeed.
Like what problem? How about crime and juvenile
delinquency? Teenage pregnancies,
dropouts, suicides, runaways, sexual
promiscuity, obesity, drug abuse and
divorce? Poverty and homelessness? Sixty
to 90 percent of all these “social
pathologies” are products of single
motherhood, Ms. Coulter demonstrates.
Yet despite the social wreckage, single motherhood is
“the active social policy of liberals,”
who celebrate the institution while,
incredibly, trashing the traditional
family. Courts and legislatures, spurred
on by media and the glitterati, have
rendered single motherhood – including
the Hollywood-fed fad of conception by
artificial insemination – not only
“socially acceptable” but a fundamental
right.
Ms. Coulter thus follows in the footsteps of the late, great
sociologist, senator and patriot Daniel
Patrick Moynihan. In his famed 1993
article “Defining Deviancy Down,”
Moynihan noted the correlation among
rising single parenthood and poverty,
medical problems, educational decline
and crime, and stated the “unmistakable
lesson” of history that “a community
that allows a large number of young men
to grow up in broken families, dominated
by women . . . asks for and gets chaos.”
He bemoaned the “general acceptance of
the situation as normal” and “none of
the marshaling of resources that is
associated with significant social
action.”
And why, pray tell? Because “a growth in
deviancy makes possible a transfer of
resources, including prestige, to those
who control the deviant population. This
control would be jeopardized if any
serious effort were made to reduce the
deviancy in question. This leads to
assorted strategies for re-defining the
behavior in question as not all that
deviant, really.”
In other words, a vast army of
lawmakers, agencies, social workers,
educators and even media has a stake in
defining the “deviant” (his word) Baby
Mama population as normal – and even
noble. Still, the poverty warrior
declared that “we are obliged to ask why
things do not change.”
Yes, change. The mantra of the moment.
Yet perhaps the best change in some
circumstances is a change back:
Love and marriage, love and marriage
It's an institute you can't disparage
Ask the local gentry, and they will say
it's elementary.
No bailout or stimulus package could do America as
much good as a return to the elementary
presumption that the only appropriate
venue for sexual expression is marriage
between one man and one woman –
preferably “until death do us part.”
How? Start by restoring that presumption in the law
and the tax code. Halt the brain-dead
practices of giving children the tools
and encouragement to engage in sex, and
single women to impregnate themselves
out of wedlock, and remember that the
concept of “just say no” originally
applied to now-vilified abstinence
programs. End the insanity of treating
vile pornography as “free speech” and
the glorification of
pre-and-extramarital sex. Re-elevate
adoption – and not by gays.
And most important, join Sammy Cahn, as Ms. Coulter
has done, in publicly redrawing a line
in the sand – and standing by it:
You can't have one; you can't have none;
You can't have one without the other.
No, sir!
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.