June 26, 2009
How George W. Bush and the American Taxpayer Helped Change
Iran
Iran’s citizens, fed up
with their oppressive theocratic government,
are spilling into the streets and revolting
at risk of death. Meanwhile the usual
suspects – from the United Nations to
leftists like President Barack Obama – are
assuming the usual full-prone position of
acute non-interventionism.
Iranians have written
to me this week to ask why the United
Nations isn’t doing anything. I replied that
it’s because George W. Bush isn’t around
anymore to file the necessary paperwork.
What Bush did, however, was set up the
framework for a cultural revolution in the
Middle East. And most people probably aren’t
even aware of how he did it. Leaving aside
the significant fact that Iran has Bush to
thank for the fact that Saddam Hussein isn’t
around to interfere in this fight, Bush
helped to lay the groundwork for a “soft
power” cultural revolution.
Compare Obama’s wish
for Iranians to more or less just sort it
out nicely with the words of George W. Bush
to the Iranian people in 2008: “My thought
is that the reformers inside Iran are brave
people, they've got no better friend than
George W. Bush, and I ask for God's
blessings on them on their very important
work. And secondly, that I would do nothing
to undermine their efforts.”
And how did Bush get
his message into Iran? Via the main U.S.
government-funded TV network: Voice of
America’s Persian News Network (PNN). The
satellite television network, broadcasting
out of Washington, D.C., in Iran’s own
language, came into existence under Bush’s
watch in July 2007. It now reaches 30
percent of Iranian adults.
I suppose one could
argue that a U.S. government-funded network
might consist of American government
propaganda, but from the BBC and CBC to NPR,
these publicly-funded outlets are almost
always the exact opposite, and rife with
leftist journalists who are attracted by the
theory that a lack of corporate and private
funding ought to make them more objective
and less beholden to outside interests
(rather than just more leftist, as a result
of the ideology of the journalists who
gravitate toward them). The fact that the
network is free of Iranian government
propaganda makes it a powerhouse for
cultural change in itself.
The American government
also operates Radio Farda, featuring both
music and news. Launched in December 2002,
the network’s Persian language programming
originates in Prague and is available on the
Internet and via radio transmission into
Iran from various transmission towers in the
Middle East.
A spokesperson for both
of these media outlets confirmed their
recent need to counteract increased signal
jamming by the Iranian government censors
since May by adding new uplinks, downlinks
and transmissions.
Iranians have also been
able to sign up to receive e-mail
notifications about new downloadable
software and Internet proxies they can use
to circumvent the Iranian government censors
to access the web sites for these networks.
The networks claim a “200 percent growth in
use of proxy servers and web censorship
circumvention software from the day before
the Friday election to three days later.”
Interventionism is a
military policy, not a rhetorical one. Via
these media outlets, America has already
helped to fuel the revolution in Iran. Yet
Obama himself seems intent on not adopting
any strong, moral leadership position,
settling instead on a few select lines
expressing the basic idea that killing
peaceful demonstrators is unacceptable.
Because he wouldn’t want to do anything that
might cause the mullahs creating all this
havoc to become unreasonable, would he? Like
maybe rig a presidential election. The other
idea floating about the media in defense of
Obama’s silence was that any strong language
on Obama’s part might incite the Iranian
regime to blame the civil unrest on America.
Within days, they did just that – despite
any non-action on Obama’s part.
What we’re seeing in
Iran is change being affected without a
single bullet fired on the part of its
leaders. And we’ve seen this before. The
Cold War ended and the Berlin Wall fell
largely because oppressed people had enough
of their government. This “wall” is a
cultural one, between oppressive Islamists
and the rest of the world, and every
demonstrator in Iran is working at tearing
it down.
French President
Nicolas Sarkozy obviously understands the
cultural nature of this battlefield: He used
the Iranian situation to address French
Parliament (notable because this hasn’t
happened in 136 years) with a barnburner
speech about the burka as an instrument for
oppression of women, and asking that a
parliamentary commission look into banning
it altogether.
Meanwhile, Obama is
voting “present”.