June 5, 2009
From Susan Boyle to Hitler: Why Some Simply Can’t Hack Fame
If we should be
learning anything from the Susan Boyle
meltdown phenomenon, in the wake of her
inpatient treatment for “exhaustion” a mere
weeks after coming to prominence, it’s that
the average person isn’t cut out for fame.
The same holds true for political leaders.
What precisely makes one person succeed
while another cracks?
Susan Boyle lived a
quiet, simple country life alongside
companions of the mainly feline persuasion,
until she was thrust into the spotlight on
Britain’s Got Talent and instantly
became the focus of fantasy projections by
every single fat slob splayed out on the
couch with a Budweiser in-hand. Wiping a
tear into their brew, it donned on them that
they, too, could become rich and famous if
Simon Cowell came knocking at their door,
dragged them and their housecoat into the
makeup chair, wiped the Cheetos off the
corner of their mouth and gave them a shot
at superstardom. Boyle doesn’t have the
greatest voice, but she’s Sarah Brightman to
every chump who likes to think he’s Frank
Sinatra on Friday nights at the karaoke bar.
If she can get “discovered”, then fame and
fortune could just as easily be theirs as
well. Or so the thinking goes.
The truth is that the
average person doesn’t have the personality
to contend with fame. What exactly is that
“x-factor” that predisposes a person to both
fame and the ability to properly manage it?
It’s precisely two things: Hard knocks over
a long period of adjustment, combined with a
histrionic personality type (and ideally,
but not always, some substance or talent).
According to the Cleveland Clinic,
histrionic people are “dramatic or
theatrical”, have “intense emotions”, need
to be “the center of attention”, and are
most likely born into this type, as it runs
in families. These people could be taking a
bath and still be a lot more interesting
than you. Just read your own Twitter feed or
recent Facebook status updates for a gut
check on your own entertainment value. Most
reality show participants ultimately drown
in the tidal wave of tedium that washes over
our 24/7 cable TV universe, and the select
few who survive aren’t equipped to handle
it.
The histrionic
personality, this “je ne sais quoi” I have
just defined, is what draws us to a person.
Think Madonna, Eminem and any successful TV
talking head who pulls in ratings – but the
ability to withstand storms of criticism is
what keeps them sane and functional under
intense public scrutiny.
“Normal” people don’t
understand this celebrity personality type
because they can’t relate. This is exactly
why celebrity is truly out of reach for the
average person, despite any delusions. The
same people who write about TV commentator
Glenn Beck, for example, being “insane”, or
about to have an on-air meltdown at any
moment, can’t relate to him because they’re
his antithesis and are probably counted on
to supply the megadose of Valium to whatever
event they attend. The political science
professor with a double PhD can’t comprehend
why guys like Beck are on TV and he isn’t.
It’s not that he’s nuts; it’s just that
you’re boring. Entertainment today is the
new public execution, the new bullfight. And
if you were plucked from the protective
walls of your ivory tower and thrown to the
vicious masses you’d crack after about five
hate mails.
If there’s anyone in
Hollywood who makes you think he or she is
as “normal” as you and your buddies – like
Jerry Seinfeld or Jay Leno, for example –
that’s just testament to their genius.
There’s a reason why these two are
successful in that realm and you and Susan
Boyle would collapse.
The prevalence of
thick-skinned, talented histrionics isn’t
limited to pop culture fame. The same rules
apply to successful political leaders. I’m
not referring to your typical “caretaker”
congressman or member of Parliament who
keeps a low profile. I’m talking about the
superstars. Let’s look at a few examples:
Winston Churchill: Rebellious child, speech impediment, largely ignored by his
mother. Everyone laughed at him when he
warned of Adolf Hitler as a possible threat.
By the time he became prime minister for the
first time in 1940, he had been taking abuse
in the federal political arena for 30 years
and had obviously developed some good coping
mechanisms. He still has some of the best
one-liners in history.
Nicolas Sarkozy: French president who went to all the “wrong” schools, grew
up being told that he was from the “wrong”
stock with a Hungarian name and claims that
he owes his success to “all the humiliations
suffered during childhood.” This “overnight
sensation” actually spent 20 years as a
mayor, plus a stint taking flack for
clamping down on ethnic riots as Interior
Minister. He denounced “French arrogance”
toward the country’s allies while Jacques
Chirac was in power, and doesn’t seem to
lack the strength required for making all
the right enemies. He doubles as France’s
shock jock, and he’s married to a former
supermodel.
George W. Bush: Born wealthy and connected, but made to work. Barbara Bush
wasn’t going to be raising any spoiled
brats. He ran some businesses before he beat
a popular incumbent Texas governor for that
job. He made difficult moral decisions
related to Texas Death Row executions, and
developed a tried and tested character and
moral conscience by the time he took office
as president. The media hung on his every
word. He doubled as Comedian-in-Chief due to
the editing of his reality show by the
mainstream media.
And now, for the most
renowned political equivalent of a reality
show crack-up:
Adolf Hitler: Spoiled by his mother, failed art school entry exams twice,
claims to have had an “easy life”. Joined
the German Worker’s Party as official
blowhard. Resumed his art career by
presiding over the design of the swastika.
Pretty much a weak, useless spoiled brat
beyond a few odd jobs as a draftsman and
painter. What Hitty wants, Hitty gets. And
the world paid for it. Relied heavily on his
“entourage” to boost his weak ego.