Paul
Ibrahim
Read Paul's bio and previous columns
February 2, 2009
Republicans Oppose
Pork-Laden Stimulus; What Do They Expect? A Cookie?
Some conservatives are lavishing House Minority Leader John Boehner and
House Republicans with praise for their opposition to the deceitfully
labeled “stimulus” package. The fact that, for at least one major piece
of legislation, the Republicans in one chamber finally demonstrated
loyalty to their principles is indeed good news. But why should they get
more than a mere nod from conservatives?
Voting against any unnecessary and wasteful government spending is
precisely what congressional Republicans are
supposed to do. As members
of a party overwhelmingly brought to power by conservatives, elected
Republicans are
supposed to oppose
government enlargement and the welfare state, while continuously pulling
government out of our lives and pocketbooks.
When a D student gets an A on a single quiz, no one considers him to be
a good student for that reason only. Likewise, the fact that for many
years congressional Republicans have acted like moderately restrained
Democrats, have wasted taxpayer money on just as much pork as Nancy
Pelosi and John Murtha, and have continued to enlarge the federal
government does not mean that conservatives should be gushing over them
at the first sign of fiscal responsibility.
In
a famous and uproarious stand up performance, comedian Chris Rock
ridicules those who live with a set of ludicrously low expectations. He
mockingly quotes them as demanding credit for taking care of their kids,
or having never been to jail. He then responds, “What do you want, a
cookie?!”
The response equally applies for any House Republicans who brag about
opposing the Democrats’ mammoth waste bill despite having been precisely
elected to do so and being expected to do at least as much for
conservative principles.
So
you opposed this instance of waste, House Republicans. What do you want,
a cookie?
Well, they shouldn’t get one. Not yet. Republicans had control of the
White House and both houses of Congress for years. Yet they managed to
increase federal spending. They expanded the federal government further
into education and Medicare territory. They refused to set obstacles to
corruption by ending pork. They failed to address the biggest Ponzi
scheme of all, Social Security. And they sacrificed excellent
conservative candidates by going all out for liberals such as Lincoln
Chafee and Wayne Gilchrest, who shamefully turned on the party the
second they no longer needed it.
And now, we are supposed to praise them for opposing a trillion-dollar
pork bill that was beyond the realm of imagination even months ago?
No, no. Countless conservatives stayed at home during the 2006 and 2008
elections, and many more ceased sending money to the Republican Party
years ago. These conservatives have instead directed their funds to a
few genuinely conservative politicians, or to organizations that help
true conservatives get elected, even at the cost of taking out liberal,
big-government Republicans (see: the Club for Growth).
Many more have held on to their cash and activism, awaiting the arrival
of someone worth it. One must only compare the McCain campaign’s
accounting books, or its rally attendance levels, immediately before and
then following Sarah Palin’s selection as vice-presidential nominee in
order to weigh the influence of conservative disaffection with the
Republican Party. In short, barring a drastic turnaround, conservatives
will not forget the past and open up their wallets to Republican
leadership for occasionally doing what it was elected to do.
Now there are signs of hope. The fact that genuine conservatives such as
Eric Cantor and Mike Pence now occupy leadership positions in the House
GOP is most certainly encouraging. The shedding of liberal Republicans
in 2006 and 2008 has tightened the Republican message to a somewhat more
convincing and conservative platform. And although it is too early to
judge, Michael Steele’s election as chairman of the Republican National
Committee just might help lead to a revival of the party that America
knew in 1994.
But it is not enough. Republicans must rediscover their small government
roots in a continuous and noticeable manner in order to win back
conservative support. Opposing wasteful Democratic legislation should
become the norm instead of an isolated manifestation of bravery.
Republicans must do what Republicans are supposed to do. Until then, no
cookies for them.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI151.
Request
permission to publish here.
|