Read Paul's bio and previous columns
December 1, 2008
Time for Government to
Stop ‘Fixing’ the Economy
Few headlines are more frightening than those announcing grand
government plans to “repair” the economy. Every time a news headline
reads “Congress Anxious to Address Economy” or “Obama Will ‘Do What’s
Necessary’ to Fix Economy,” Americans should start worrying twice as
much about their economic future as they already do.
Few political arguments these days are backed up with facts, but in this
case there is vast empirical evidence that governmental action on
economic issues almost always exacerbates existing economic problems and
often creates new ones (the exception, of course, being when government
acts to undo interventionist policies it had previously adopted).
of this past summer, 90 percent of the gains in the Dow Jones Industrial
Average in the past 111 years has come when Congress was in recess. This
trend started to become even more lopsided a few decades ago when the
degree of government intervention in the American economy intensified
rapidly. In the past 45 years, for instance, the S&P 500 Index barely
went up 1.6 percent yearly when Congress was in session, but shot up to
a striking annual average of 17.6 percent when Congress was out of
How can this dramatic inverse correlation be explained?
First, there is the element of uncertainty. When Congress is in session,
the market knows that some industry is going to get hurt by some new
regulation from politicians seeking to gratify their special interests,
and that another industry is going to have its lobbying dollars rewarded
with a nice, arbitrary subsidy. What the market doesn’t know is which
industries will be affected, and where political decisions will force
money to be invested. On the other hand, when Congress is in recess,
investors are more likely to invest in industries that will create jobs,
quality products, efficient business models and wealth.
Second, members of Congress are convinced that just because they are on
Capitol Hill, they must do something. Even if the economy is in
good shape, but especially if it is not, the Hill’s and media’s
assumption that Congress must “do something” is a foregone conclusion.
The question only becomes what exactly they must do. It rarely occurs to
them that most of the time, the best thing they can do for the economy
is to just stay out of the way. But because of the culture of
unnecessary and counterproductive need for action, policies are enacted
by Congress that usually harm the economy and thus hurt the markets.
This urge to “do something” has been tried repeatedly in American
history, and has failed as many times. During the Great Depression, for
instance, President Herbert Hoover was urged to “do something.” He did.
Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which impaired free trade,
supported an increase in taxes and made attempts to provide
government-sponsored jobs. As good economists predicted at the time,
these policies only made the situation worse.
But that did not stop Franklin Roosevelt from adopting similar
anti-growth policies. Roosevelt’s massive expansion of government and
attempt to “create” new jobs did nothing but to prolong the Great
Depression until World War II. What Roosevelt didn’t understand is that
government can never “create” jobs, it can only reassign them. When
government funds a new public sector job, it has taken enough money out
of the economy to defund a private sector job that was going to be
efficiently and sustainably created by the free market.
it took both a Republican and a Democrat to turn the Great Depression
into a greater depression. Likewise, it is taking us both the Bush
Administration and the Obama Administration to move the economy from
somewhat off-course to going in reverse. Will they ever learn?
Uncertainty is killing the market today. Americans – intelligent
Americans who normally act based on reasonable market expectations –
cannot make investment decisions because they know that their fates
would depend not on realistic market behavior, but on the whim of
politicians. And today’s wild financial swings, the likes of which we
have never seen before, are a direct result of uncertainty over what the
government will do.
Despite this precedent of government intervention in the economy,
America still boasts a history of minimal interventionism when compared
to other world governments. Is it thus a coincidence that we have the
greatest and most successful economy in the history of the world? Why,
then, are we going in the exact direction that less successful countries
have gone in? Why, since we have proved to the world that the freest
markets become the wealthiest ones, are we ignoring the very same lesson
we are supposed to be teaching the rest?
Virtually all the wealth we have today – the cars, the light bulbs, the
surgeries, the music, the Thanksgiving turkeys, the fact that you can
reliably find an unimaginable variety of products when you need them –
comes from the free market and from the private sector. This wealth is
the direct result of billions and billions of interactions between
people who, through their actions, decide where their resources would be
most efficiently used.
how can 535 congressmen, one Treasury Secretary and one president claim
to be in a position to know how best to allocate the resources of 300
million people? It simply cannot be done – at least not in good
The only “something” that government can and must do is, indeed, to
undo its interventionist policies of high taxes, excessive
regulation and dubious subsidies to cozy corporations. But beyond that,
it is time for government to stop “fixing” the economy. Good leaders
aren’t ones who do the most, but ones who do what is right. And
sometimes, the right thing to do is stay out of the way.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
This is Column # PI142.
permission to publish here.