Paul
Ibrahim
Read Paul's bio and previous columns
October 13, 2008
What if Barack Obama
Had Been Elected in 2004?
Despite the fact that Barack Obama has arrived where he is today by
either disqualifying virtually all of his political opponents or having
them succumb to scandal, despite the fact that he has no legislative
accomplishments aside from repeatedly voting “present,” despite the fact
that he has accumulated no foreign policy experience whatsoever aside
from a speech in Berlin, and despite the fact that he has demonstrated
awful judgment in his associations and his policy positions, too many
Americans apparently still believe that he is qualified to be our chief
executive and commander-in-chief.
Well then, what better can we do than determine how Obama would have
handled the presidency had he been elected in 2004? Let us for a moment
pretend that, putting aside the fact that in 2004 he was a state senator
playing poker with other low-level Illinois politicians engaged in
Chicago-style politics, Obama won the 2004 Democratic nomination and the
presidency.
First and foremost, the Iraq troop surge that John McCain advocated, and
that George W. Bush finally embraced, would have never taken place, and
we would have never found ourselves overwhelmingly winning the war as we
are now. Judging from Obama’s own promises, we would have withdrawn from
Iraq while violence was at its peak, and handed it to Al Qaeda and other
terrorists who would have turned it into a massive, undefeatable base
from which they would launch operations in the Middle East and the
entire world.
America would have been humiliated and rendered unwilling to get
involved in any military operation around the world. Any sense of
security in the Middle East would have been eliminated for at least two
or three generations.
Had Obama’s mentor, Joe Biden, been his vice president at the time, the
“foreign policy expert,” as we have been misled to believe, would have
convinced his protégé to adopt his plan to partition Iraq into three
pieces, which is one policy that the Iraqis are in complete agreement to
oppose. Such a plan would have handed the Shiite south (including Iraq’s
only sea outlet) to Iran on a silver platter, deprived the Sunnis from
any significant oil revenue and invited the Turks to have their way with
the Kurdish north. Yes, how comforting it is to have Biden at Obama’s
side.
In
addition to destroying the Middle East, Obama’s policies would have
damaged relations with countries that are begging for free trade
agreements with the United States, as we have seen in his opposition to
crucial and valuable agreements with Colombia, South Korea and Panama.
Since the 2004 election, the United States has approved or implemented
free trade agreements with Australia, Bahrain, Morocco, Oman, Peru,
Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the
Dominican Republic. If Obama in most cases cannot stand up to pressures
from labor unions and special interests that oppose these agreements
despite their clear benefit to the U.S., there is no reason to believe
that America would have made such progress on free trade agreements had
he been president.
On
the domestic front, things would not have looked much better. Obama
would have revoked the Bush tax cuts, which would have brought about a
decrease in investment long before today (indeed we are currently seeing
this fall in economic growth partly because of the impending tax hike
that would result from the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, which
investors now know is likely under a Democratic Congress, and certain
under a Democratic president).
Of
course, a decrease in investment means a decrease in jobs, a fall in the
stock market, and probably a recession. All of these would have been
magnified by strong support for the culprits behind today’s crisis,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, of which Republicans, including McCain, had
long ago called for an examination. But they were stopped by Democrats
such as Obama, who is the second-highest recipient of political
contributions from Fannie in history – despite having been in the
Senate for only months. Skyrocketing government spending would not have
helped, especially if it included shady pet projects such as the $1
million earmark that Obama requested for the hospital that had recently
tripled his wife’s salary.
Social policies would have also succumbed to Obama’s extremist
tendencies. The loss of one conservative and one moderate U.S. Supreme
Court justice would have paved the way for Obama’s nomination of judges
that would have given liberals a 7-2 majority on most issues and at
least a 6-3 majority on all issues. Important cases like D.C. v.
Heller would have turned out less pleasantly than those of us who
have read the Constitution would expect, and meaningful gun rights would
have been a thing of the past.
Another case, Roe v. Wade would have seen no hope of being
overturned for at least another generation, leading to continued
abortion on demand. Well, on second thought, perhaps it would have been
overturned, but not for the reasons most Americans hope for. Barack
Obama would have been dissatisfied with abortion being limited to
pre-born babies. As he has thrice indicated in the Illinois State
Senate, where he voted to end the life of those babies who survive
failed abortion attempts and completely leave the woman’s body alive,
Obama would have sought to apply abortion rights to post-birth babies as
well. Unfortunately, there is no indication yet of what age a baby girl
or infant would have to be before Obama decides to give her the legal
right to live.
So
where would we be had Obama won in 2004? We would have a wrecked Middle
East, damaged relations with dozens of countries, a humiliated military,
economic troubles that make today’s problems look like Disneyland,
rampantly corrupt spending practices, a hard-left Supreme Court, no gun
rights and post-pregnancy babies in severe trouble. Never mind that
Obama would have had a close spiritual advisor who explicitly hates
America (that was back when Obama couldn’t “disown” him more than he
could disown his white grandmother and the black community), a first
lady who had not yet been proud of her country, and pals hanging out in
the White House who had literally planned to bomb the White House.
Why, then, would Obama be any better if we elect him in 2008?
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI135.
Request
permission to publish here.
|
|