Nathaniel
Shockey
Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns
here
September 9, 2009
Inglourious Basterds: Best.Scene.Ever
There have been not one, but two scenes in movies this year that
rank among my favorite scenes ever. Now accompanying the final dialogue
between Beatrix Kiddo and Bill in Kill Bill, Anton Ego’s column
in Ratatouille (voiced by Peter O’Toole), Melvin Udall’s (Jack
Nicholson) rebuke of Simon Bishop at the beginning of As Good As It
Gets, and the scene from The Godfather when Michael Corleone
shoots Sollozzo and Captain McCluskey in the Italian restaurant, are the
opening montage of Carl Fredricksen’s life in Up and the opening
scene in Quentin Tarantino’s latest film, Inglourious Basterds.
If
the academy had an award for “best scene” and/or “best actor in a
scene,” it would not be too much of a risk to award it to Tarantino and
Christoph Waltz before the year even ends. I’m telling you, it was that
good.
It
opens with a man chopping wood outside a wooden cottage. He is a man’s
man, not appearing to have a zest for life, nor a disdain for it. His
name is Pierre LaPadite, he has three daughters, and as we later learn,
he is under suspicion of harboring a family of Jews from the Nazis. Even
after Colonel Hans Landa arrives to investigate him, the audience can
only assume that Pierre will play a leading role in this movie. But by
the end of the scene we realize that this was not about Pierre LaPadite.
It was about Landa.
The magnitude of Landa’s presence in this scene, in my experience as a
movie fan, could only be rivaled by a handful of other characters ever.
As soon as he arrives and requests entry into the humble cottage, it’s
clear by the look on Pierre’s face that he is a man to be both respected
and feared. Dreadfully articulate and aware of every detail and emotion
being felt in a room, one would be loathe to attempt to hide anything
from him. Landa is both loquacious and direct, relishes in displaying
his intellect, and owns a much larger pipe than you do.
For the first part of the scene, I had no idea if the humble cow farmer
was harboring Jews. Actually, I assumed he wasn’t. I just figured he was
scared to death of Landa, as anyone in their right mind would be of a
brilliant man-hunter appointed by Hitler.
But before too long we realize Landa is a much more interesting
character than Pierre. And quite frankly, it would be a disservice of
tragic proportions to the film if this evildoer weren’t around until the
very end.
The primary point of this scene was to explain how ruthless and
formidable an adversary Landa was, and although the courage and
magnanimity of Pierre were to be appreciated, they were simply no match.
When Landa originally arrives, he meets Pierre and his three daughters,
and although he gives no indication that he’d ever do anything to harm
them, the audience feels assured that all four of these humble folk are
in danger of every unimaginable horror. Landa explains that he’s
relatively new to this job, and although he realizes that Pierre has
already been questioned for harboring a lost local family of Jews, he
has to question him again. After all, whenever there is new manager, in
order to be thorough there will inevitably be some “overlap”.
LaPadite offers a drink and the Colonel requests milk, as this is a
dairy farm and the milk must be delicious. There aren’t many instances
when one is anxious over watching another drink a glass of milk, but
this is certainly among them. For some reason, the audience fears that,
at any point, Landa might unleash the full magnitude of his power and
rage.
Toward the end of this 20-minute-or-so scene, the camera pans down,
below the table at which the two men are sitting, below the wooden
floor, to reveal the people hiding directly underneath. And suddenly we
fully understand and appreciate the enormous anxiety Pierre has been
feeling as soon as the Colonel and his henchmen arrived at his house.
This is not a man with whom one plays poker, especially if life is on
the line.
Before the scene ended, it occurred to me that this was movie magic I
was witnessing. And although I was as petrified of this man as I’ve ever
been of any movie character, I really didn’t want this scene to end. It
did, unfortunately, and quite unhappily. But at least I knew I was in
for one hell of a great movie.
© 2009
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #
NS186.
Request permission to publish here. |