Nathaniel
Shockey
Read Nathaniel's bio and previous columns
here
June 10, 2009
Pixar’s UP: A
Beacon of Hope and Reason
Why can’t there be more movies like Pixar’s most recent film, UP?
The story was so unbelievably fresh and well told that even I was at a
loss for words when the movie ended. The first 10 minutes provided the
backdrop for our hero, the curmudgeonly, crotchety Carl. But this movie
wasn’t about why he was old and grumpy, it was about the way he learned
to look at it. I’ll get back to that later.
The music was also remarkably good. It was melodramatic, not
understated, maybe even overstated, in a way that fit the style of the
movie. When everything was going crazy, the music followed along,
sweeping me up in the frenzy and panic of the moment. When things were
somber, reflective, when Carl was looking at a picture, there was the
simple melody on the piano that reminded me of the music from As Good
As It Gets. And during one of the most poignant moments of the
movie, when Carl finally arrived where he thought he wanted to be, there
was no music. Only the deafening silence of loneliness.
People acted like people and animals like animals (for the most part).
The dogs had simple, stupid, honest thoughts – exaggerations of what
grown-ups would imagine, not what children do. Russell, the chubby
little kid, was oblivious, honest and, as we eventually realized, deeply
wounded by his father’s absence. Carl did not act in the way most
elderly people act in movies, or if I may be so judgmental, in most of
our minds. When the men showed up to take him away to a nursing home,
which the storytellers helped us visualize by showing us a brochure
whose cover featured two old, married, smiling people, one of them
cracked that he was probably taking his 85th pee of the day.
That’s when the balloons came out the chimney of his house and he flew
away.
Yes, he was old, and his back repeatedly gave out on him. He had
dentures, and walked with a cane that had four tennis balls on the
bottom. He was grumpy and wary of new and younger society. He wouldn’t
sell his old house for any amount of money. But he was more than that,
and evidently quite capable of learning new tricks.
Of
the many, many lessons of this movie, which is perhaps even wiser than
Pixar’s Ratatouille, The Incredibles or Toy Story, the one
Carl learned was that he was living his true fantasy the whole time he
was chasing the one he had promised to his future wife when they first
met as toddlers.
Among the themes in this movie are:
-
An inability to
have children
-
Digging into
savings in order to pay for unexpected expensive life events
-
Legal action that
drives a man from his home
-
Loss of a spouse
And this movie was for kids?
Yes and no. Some of these would be difficult for a child to understand.
But that doesn’t mean they can’t understand, or that these events don’t
belong in a “kids” movie. I would say they belong more than the majority
of the unrealistic and sometimes flat-out untrue ideas in most of the
kids’ movies I’ve ever seen. (And for what it’s worth, the children in
the theater were laughing almost as much as I was.) But even more
importantly, this really isn’t a kids’ movie. It’s a movie I urge
everyone to see.
So
why don’t more movies like this exist? I guess you can say that there is
only one Brad Bird, or John Lasseter, or Pete Docter. But how does Pixar
have such an uncanny knack for finding them? Or maybe they just find
Pixar. I don’t know.
What I do know is that, as a fan of movies, I get sick and tired of the
same old garbage that pours out of Hollywood week after week after week.
And year after year, Pixar reminds me that there is at least one beacon
of hope left for truth and reason in the world of films.
© 2009
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #
NS173.
Request permission to publish here. |