ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Llewellyn

King

 

 

Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns

 

July 9, 2009

Blame Jimmy Carter: The Death of Washington’s Three-Martini Lunch

 

Despite Jimmy Carter, lunch is alive and well in Washington. But it is a different rite than it was before his presidency.

 

Carter was the president who launched an attack on the notorious three-martini lunch. He not only scorned the business lunch culture, but he also changed the tax law so that only half the cost now can be deducted.

 

Carter became a dirty word in the restaurants of Washington. Yet the change in luncheon habits may have occurred anyway.

 

During the Carter years, drinking at lunch slowed to a stop. There is hardly any drinking at lunch these days. Headwaiters proffer wine lists to shaking heads.

 

However it wasn’t Carter’s jiggling the tax code that killed the three-martini lunch, but rather a great social change that coincided with his watch. For complex reasons, the decision-makers of the big cities dried out in the ‘70s.

 

My guess is that the world became more competitive, secretaries were not prepared to cover for their intoxicated bosses, drunk-driving laws tightened and health became an issue.

 

For me, the old Washington lunch was exemplified by a wonderful man, a great friend and a tremendous lobbyist. His name was Tom Clark, and he represented the nuclear interests of the General Electric Company in Washington. Clark, who, alas, died more than two decades ago, was the uncontested master of the Washington lunch. And, yes, he drank three martinis with his lunch every day.

 

Clark was an American patrician, a kind of nobleman. He was also marvelous company and a great lobbyist. His principal tool was lunch, but he didn’t roam from restaurant to restaurant. He lunched every day at the same restaurant: Le Provencal, a classic French place, where he always sat at the same large, round table.

 

Clark’s guests were a who’s who of Washington movers and shakers. There would be a cabinet secretary at his table, maybe a senator and often a House member. I was one of the regulars, and as a reporter, these feasts were valuable but mostly fun. You could drink anything you liked so long as it was distilled, fermented or brewed. There was a large menu, but most of Clark’s guests followed his lead and ordered grilled Dover sole.

 

Well, there are no more three-hour, three-martini lunches, and grilled Dover sole has given way to a new kind of eating: Stacked, fusion food. Actually, it is an attempt to eat very little because everyone in the chattering classes in Washington seems to be on a diet.

 

Of course, without alcohol, three-hour lunches are out. Now we choke down the ersatz food with bottled water, ice tea or diet soda. Tom Clark would not have approved.    

 

It is the shorter lunch that has allowed the development of that gastronomic and political horror – the power breakfast. All over Washington, power brokers are breakfasting with people from Congress, the media and the political financiers, who are the kingmakers.

 

Eating around Washington is really not about deals and arm-twisting, but rather opening, and keeping open, channels of communication that later might be used to push a lobbying message. In the days when the martini ruled, it was a bit about communications but mostly it was fun. It was just that it was more productive to have fun with a cabinet member or an important senator than, well, your neighbor.

 

In the old days, the greatest lunch place in Washington was another French restaurant: Sans Souci. Its headwaiter, Paul, was known for his prodigious memory of names. You had to fight for a reservation and fight to be seated at a good table. The most important table – in a restaurant that was fairly small and had terraces of tables – was the Kennedy table. At this table, Kennedy family members lunched with their White House and media friends. Columnist Art Buchwald was often seen with Ethel Kennedy. A cheery hail from that table as you passed by and you were on the A-list.

 

There’s nothing that looks like an A-list in Washington now, and no restaurant dominates political and media circles. Also since the Carter presidency, White House staffers have favored the White House mess over restaurants.

 

Only retired people dare quaff midday martinis these days. As Rudyard Kipling noted, “There’s sore decline in Adam’s line.”

             

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # LK102. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause