ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Llewellyn

King

 

 

Read Llewellyn's bio and previous columns

 

May 28, 2009

The Supremes Have It Made

 

Oh, to be a federal judge – a lifetime judge. Ah, to interpret the 222-year-old U.S. Constitution for lawmakers, or to have the unbridled joy of deciding what Congress meant without being able to ask it.

It’s delightful to be on the federal bench and divine to be on the Supreme Court, where you can play mind games and search for writers’ clues hidden in the Constitution. It’s the treasure hunt that never ends. More: You can look at plain words – such as those in the Second Amendment – and, depending on your personal interests, opine on what they mean with two radically different interpretations.

 

You can also stir things up by interpreting what your predecessors had already interpreted. Stare decisis et non quieta mouvere (settled law)? That’s just what they tell the kids in law school. The pranksters on the highest court in the land will have none of it. Hence Roe v. Wade hangs in the balance all the time. No stare decisis there.

 

Can anything be as much fun as deciding what a group of, albeit exceptional and erudite, 18th-century white men thought about the Internet? Talk about trivial pursuit. But it is not trivial; it can reshape the country. As each term approaches, fancy contemplating how much fun it would be to rearrange history by persuading just four of your fellow justices.

 

But that's not all. Working conditions are pretty nice, too. You can't be fired. The pay is good. There is no mandatory retirement. All heavy lifting, from your suitcase to a weighty opinion, can be delegated to those too-eager clerks. The little buggers plan to make millions on the strength of clerking for you. Make them work for it, whether it's picking up your laundry or redefining the rights of the press.

 

But that's still not all. As an added bonus, the evidence suggests you’ll live a long time. After all, there's no strain. You are treated with unctuous deference. Even if you are so gaga you can't tell one colleague from another, a thousand law schools will hang on your ramblings. Clerks will write opinions for you based on what they think you said. Deferential colleagues will try to side with you, even if they think you're full of it.

 

And don't forget the sheer exhilaration of writing a minority opinion. You can really let off steam in those. It's the next best thing to talk radio for venting and it has a much greater impact. Just savor the shock on your colleagues’ faces when you turn against them and, quoting your smartest clerk, you tell them what the Founders meant.

 

You've enjoyed the reality television show Survivor. Well, that's what life on the court can be like – with the additional pleasure that you can't be voted off, canceled or bitten by a poisonous snake. On the other hand, the chances for intragroup sex seem dim. Supreme Court justices opine on sex more than . . . you fill the rest.

 

The greatest pleasure of all, though, is to go against the constituency that endorsed you. From Earl Warren to David Souter, this fun has been intense. Appointing a justice is a crap shoot, like Henry II appointing Thomas Becket to be Archbishop of Canterbury. High perfidy is possible.

 

In recent years, things have been changing for the justices: More women and minorities have joined the all-white-male rumpus room. This change to a representative court brings up issues we should be informed about. Have the Great Ones had to clean up their language, put down the seat on the highest legal throne in the land, and does Clarence Thomas speak without being spoken to? Does Antonin Scalia smirk in private as well as in public, and does John Paul Stevens remember when he was born?

 

However democratic we try to be, when presidents nominate someone for the highest court in the land, they create a demigod, beyond the reach of politicians and their jackals, journalists. They enter their own Pantheon, as sanctified and superior as the gods of ancient Rome who were given, like the Supreme Court, a marble temple, courtesy of the Emperor Hadrian.

           

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # LK097. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause