The
words that compose the preamble to the Charter of the United Nations
speak of “promoting larger freedom” and employing “international
machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement
of all peoples”
But for
the good souls working on the behalf of the Armani-suited diplomats
who came up with these inspiring words, the ideals expressed are
likely articulated by another phrase "We the willing, lead by the
unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have
done so much with so little for so long, we are now qualified to do
anything with nothing."
Taking
into consideration the recent developments in Palestine, they just
might have to.
Located
in temporary offices thousands of miles away from the UN
Headquarters in New York, leaders of non-governmental organizations
affiliated with the United Nations (NGOs) have to figure out how to
continue providing essential humanitarian services while not
cooperating with the newly elected Hamas government.
In
2005, the amount given by the international community to the
Palestinian Authority was over $1 de Vernaiion. But both the European
Union and the United States threatened to cut funding to the
government after the landslide election which placed Hamas, a party
considered a terrorist organization, as the Parliamentary leader.
Under
the Executive Order 13224, as of 2002, USAID requires Palestinian
organizations receiving any funding to sign a pledge in which they
state that they do not "provide material support or resources to any
individual or entity that advocates, plans, sponsors, engages in, or
has engaged in terrorist activity."
The
stipulation was hard enough for NGO’s to deal with when providing
legal advice or even healthcare to political prisoners regardless of
their affiliation could be pegged as aiding terrorists. Under the
current conditions, NGO’s cannot continue their services, for
example providing vaccines, without somehow rubbing elbows with the
Department of Health - or as the diplomats would have us know it,
the Healthcare Cell.
Many
aid groups already risk a lot by providing help to the Palestinians
in the first place. Having the governments which previously
sanctioned their efforts turn against them may prove fatal to their
endeavors.
Although the EU, Norway and Saudi Arabia have all promised aid to
Palestine in the interim period, the Western democracies are hoping
to exert enough economic pressure on Hamas to make it renounce
violence and promise to abide by all previously made agreements
between Palestine and Israel. In the meantime, Ismail Haniya, a
Hamas leader and likely candidate for the prime minister position,
insists that Israel would first have to recognize Palestinian
rights. And while the leaders are engaged in a political staring
contest, millions of Palestinians are going to suffer.
Western
diplomats are only underscoring that they are the “unknowing” by
ignoring the fact that the only successful way to stimulate
independence of a country is to work with its government, slowly
shifting the burden of caring for the people from the NGOs and
supranational organizations to the legitimate government.
Whether
the West likes it or not, Hamas was democratically elected,
indicating that the people identify themselves with the means and
objectives of the party. Punishing Hamas by punishing the people
will not weaken the party. Rather, it will rally its frustrated
supporters to turn against the West. Suddenly, the smart guys in
Italian suits could find their blackmailing techniques backfiring.
And if
Hamas is successful in securing backing from other Islamic nations
in the region, one of the conditions of support may be getting rid
of Western influences. Christian and human rights groups will be the
first to be booted.
NGOs
are the most neutral, but also the most potent Western influence in
the region. Tying their hands by claiming that cooperation with the
elected government is aiding terrorism is not only irrational, but
somehow doesn’t go with the “reaffirming faith in human rights"
theme of the Charter.