December 7, 2005
Who Will Insist on
Accountability for Dishonest War?
“Mother whose heart hung
humble as a button
On the bright splendid
shroud of your son,
Do not weep.
War is kind”
Written at the cusp of the
twentieth century, Stephen Crane’s poignant words may ring true for the
naïve youths captivated by glory promising Army commercials peppered
throughout popular TV sitcoms. To those whom the poem actually addresses,
it echoes with cruel irony.
As the number of soldiers
wounded and killed in Iraq grows larger, the number of victims at home
multiplies exponentially. The mothers, fathers, spouses, children,
siblings, friends and colleagues of soldiers are all forever affected by
the consequences of the conflict. The gestalt of victory is built from
thousands of personal losses. The kind of losses no supranational
organization inspector can measure or qualify. The kind of losses that
are brandished behind closed doors of private homes rather than on the
six o’clock news.
No formal acknowledgment
from a faceless institution can amend them. Pay cannot heal depression
or a torn body, praise cannot raise the dead. It is only the acceptance
of responsibility and appropriate consequences that can come close to
mending the relationship between the government and those who suffered
in or because of the War in Iraq.
The decision to go to war
was not an honest mistake. The plan for attacking Iraq was carefully
prepared and presented by the most prominent American statesmen and they
should be held accountable for what was a conscious failure to protect
those who trusted them.
Maybe the mothers who lost
their children and the children who lost their fathers could make peace
with the war- if there was a justification for it. The truth is that
there was no Just Cause for going to war against Iraq. It certainly
cannot be qualified as a defensive war. Iraq showed no intentions of a
military attack on the United States. The pretext that it was necessary
to use force to stop great human rights abuses is also suspicious. If
that were the real motive, we would have troops occupying half of
Africa. And enough has been said about the weapons of mass destruction
(or lack thereof) that it is safe to say that helping the Russians find
ones they cannot account for may have been more accurate.
The war has caused
unnecessary suffering to thousands of Americans, but who is to be held
accountable? Should the Administration bear the blame? Or should it be
the Congress which approved the war, theoretically acting as an
instrument of the people? Or does a share of the culpability lie with
the voters who elected both?
The varying degrees of
responsibility can be distributed among multiple actors. The
distribution of responsibility is complex and the authority to allocate
it problematic. Consequently the general trend among the American public
has been to avoid the issue. With governmental and self-imposed checks
on media outlets in place, we have grown accustomed to averting our eyes
from the effects of the war. It is ironic that while we wage relentless
warfare against the strangers who have done us harm, we are quick to
overlook the stern mistakes made by our leadership. Again and again we
easily forgive the transgressions it has made against our own people.
Is the trend a political
representation of the values of a self-proclaimed Christian nation?
Hardly.
As Jesus reminded his
followers in Luke 17:3, “"If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he
repents, forgive him”.
The
American people are yet to seriously rebuke the government. And
repentance on the part of the current leadership would probably be one
of the signs of the Apocalypse. Those bearing the burden of the war
deserve more than lip service. In the short term, they deserve a formal
apology and reparations where they are appropriate. In the long term,
they deserve the security that the mistakes made will not be repeated.
This responsibility is shared by us, the voters. It is our duty to not
support or re-elect those who, while pursuing personal gains, send
innocent people in harm’s way or as Thomas McGrath wrote in 1972,
“While…the
lying famous corrupt
Senators mine our lives for another war.”
© 2005 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # LB3.
Request permission to publish here.
|