The
European Union has done an exquisite job averting its gaze from the
fiscal, social and political discrepancies member countries have
perpetrated over the years. Don’t meet any of the economic standards
to convert to the Euro? Not willing to give women standard
reproductive health options? Eh, you can come in. The cheap labor,
potential to buy up the land we tried to conquer 60 years prior and
an opportunity to add another place to fly the pretty flag is a fair
trade.
But the
unofficial power ranking and profound inequalities between member
states, too often hidden behind politicians’ smiles or by flowery
rhetoric, are being brought into broad daylight. And who do we have
to thank for this exposure? The U.S.’ own CIA.
Several
EU member states are not so keen on averting their eyes from the
shortcomings of the U.S. and have expressed concern over the
allegations that the CIA has been transporting suspected terrorists
to secret interrogation centers throughout Europe.
The
Swiss have condemned the United States for the practice. At a news
conference a Swiss official said that, “There are camps in
Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay outside any legal system. Others have
been taken in Europe and rendered to other countries for
unacceptable treatment." He also accused the U.S. of “outsourcing”
torture to European countries.
But the
Swiss investigation didn’t just point fingers at the Americans. It
also brought forth the allegation that the governments of countries
where the temporary torture camps were set up knew about and granted
permission for their existence. Among those implicated is Poland,
named as the center for the operations by the Human Rights Watch.
So we
Poles are in a bit of a pickle. We have to go along with the
Europeans, whose mission is proving that at least once the U.S.
government cannot get away with breaking international law to
maintain our image as a true member of the EU. In fact, our Prime
Minister has launched a formal inquiry into the matter.
But
there is a catch. If the inquiry yields the same results as that of
the Swiss, the relationship between Poland and the U.S. will be
severely strained. Poland does not have the economic and power
capital that its western European neighbors do, meaning that it is
largely dependent on them.
But
until it can fully stand on its own two feet it cannot afford to put
all of its eggs in one basket, and has made the decision to also
maintain close ties with the superpower across the Atlantic.
The
European Union isn’t so much about “Diversity in Unity” but
“Diversity in Use.” To some nations the European Union is a means of
advancement of political and economic agendas and exerting power
over other parts of the continent. To others it is the only way to
acquire relative security in an increasingly interdependent world.
Thus
poorer, less powerful EU countries cannot afford to expose an
important ally like the U.S., even if the transgressions outlined by
the Swiss and Human Rights Watch are true. It creates a Catch-22,
and a loss of trust by the EU or U.S. (or both) will result.
While
the CIA is conducting Operation CYA, countries caught in the middle
will have to pay the real price.
Although EU countries ranging from the most powerful to the lowest
ranking are implicated, identical results of the investigations will
mean entirely different things, depending on what’s at stake.
The
U.S. cannot afford to break relations with Britain or France, even
if their governments are instrumental in constructing a bullet proof
case proving all the allegations that are currently being presented.
But a
country like Poland, a much praised member of the Coalition of the
Willing, can easily fall out of America’s good graces with little
repercussions to the U.S.
No
matter who prevails in the investigation- the EU nations that are
making the accusations or the U.S. which is denying them- it’s those
with allegiances to both who are inevitably the ones who will get
the short end of the stick.