Jamie
Weinstein
Read Jamie's bio and previous columns
November 10, 2008
Obama Makes History in 2008; Can Bobby Jindal Make More in 2012?
The morning after his narrow electoral loss to George W. Bush in 2004,
John Kerry conceded the election in a very gracious concession speech.
"In an American election, there are no losers," Kerry told supporters
assembled in Boston's Faneuil Hall, "because whether or not our
candidates are successful, the next morning we all wake up as Americans.
That is the greatest privilege and most remarkable good fortune that can
come to us on Earth."
So
was true then, so is true today.
Americans didn't reject John McCain last Tuesday. They didn't vote
against anybody. Rather, they voted for somebody. They voted for an
inspirational figure who appealed to their best hopes and promised them
better tomorrows.
The truth of the matter is that John McCain faced an uphill battle from
the very beginning. The party of a sitting president generally gets
blamed for a bad economy, and McCain had the Herculean task of
convincing voters to put another Republican in office during a time of
great economic turmoil. Beating the economy and Barack Obama were
just too much for even a great man like John McCain to achieve. And make
no mistake, John McCain is a great man, one of the finest to have ever
served this country.
I
watched the election from an underground bar on the campus of the London
School of Economics. Hundreds of students gathered in the early hours of
Wednesday morning to see who Americans would choose. These students were
overwhelmingly supportive of Obama, so much so that, to their discredit,
they booed every time John McCain picked up a state. But at 4 a.m.
London time, when CNN declared Barack Obama the winner, something
special happened. After the cheering ended, the exultant onlookers began
chanting: "USA, USA, USA."
Now, I don't know how many Americans were in the crowd, but there is no
question that a good proportion of those chanting USA were foreigners.
It was a remarkable sight and I couldn't help but smile.
Symbolically, Barack Obama's election as president means something very
important. It proves that any child, no matter their background or
ethnic origin, can achieve their dreams in America. It proves that
America remains that great land of opportunity that has drawn and
continues to draw immigrants from around the world. For a moment, there
is nothing wrong with ideological opponents of Obama taking in, and even
appreciating, the history that was made on Tuesday. I know I did.
In
the wake of last Tuesday's electoral defeat, the Republican Party will
have to find a new leader to rally behind. If they have any shot at
taking on Barack Obama in 2012, they will have to nominate a candidate
who is energetic, relatively young, smart, exciting and, just as
importantly, a very able communicator. Republicans cannot get their
ideas across to the American people if they do not have a leader who can
speak effectively and movingly.
As
McCain's vice-presidential nominee, Sarah Palin will likely leverage her
newfound fame into a 2012 presidential run. She is, however, not the
leader the Republican Party needs. Besides failing to show a strong
grasp of the foreign policy challenges that confront America, she did
not demonstrate the gravitas that one expects from a president. If
Republicans go this route and nominate Palin, it will mean certain
defeat in 2012.
Few doubt that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney is eyeing the
opportunity to run again in 2012. Romney has many positives, most
importantly his tremendous record in the private sector. Yet, in 2008,
Romney tried to be all things to all segments of the conservative base.
By choosing this route, he came across as inauthentic. If he changes
course and runs in 2012 as the businessman candidate that he is, he may
well have a shot to win the Republican nomination.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee must also be seen as among the
top contenders for the Republican nomination in 2012. Huckabee is a
fantastic communicator and a likeable person, but his economic populism
makes him a poor choice to lead the party.
Columnist Robert Novak reported last week that former Speaker of the
House Newt Gingrich has been mentioned by party leaders as a 2012
contender. There is no one in the Republican Party who has more ideas
than Newt. He is a brilliant man, a great communicator, and would likely
make a fine president. Unfortunately, he has a lot of personal baggage
that may be hard to overcome.
There is no potential 2012 presidential hopeful more interesting than
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal. At 37, Jindal is the youngest governor
in the country. Though young, his resume is dazzling. A graduate of
Brown University, Jindal studied at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. He
turned down acceptances to Yale Law School and Harvard Medical School to
go into government.
After Oxford, Jindal worked briefly at the highly respected consulting
firm McKinsey & Company. At just 24 years of age, Jindal was appointed
Secretary of Louisiana's Department of Health and Hospitals. He has also
served as an assistant secretary in the Health and Human Services
department and as a U.S. Congressman.
On
top of all this, Jindal is an outstanding communicator and his story is
one Americans will embrace because it testifies to the American dream.
The son of Indian immigrants, Jindal very well may be president one day,
and that day just may well be in January 2013.
There will be other candidates who will certainly throw their hat into
the ring in the coming years. But if you want to know the future of the
Republican Party it might be smart to watch closely what is going on in
Baton Rouge.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is column #
JW043.
Request permission to publish here. |