ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Jessica

Vozel

 

 

Read Jessica's bio and previous columns here

 

July 13, 2009

When You’re Broke, You Love IKEA, Until . . . Oh No

 

In two weeks, I’ll be moving from my large, shared apartment near downtown Cincinnati to a much smaller space in cornfield-and-college-kid-populated Bowling Green, Ohio. To ease my anxieties over such a move – away from my significant other and his dog, which has become my dog, too; away from close friends and a vibrant neighborhood I’ve grown to love; away from the unique architectural details, hardwood floors and two spacious bedrooms of my current place – I’ve channeled my energy into making the new place in Bowling Green a home. 

 

Doing so has been no easy task. As a grad student, summers mean stretching my last school-year paycheck as far as it can possibly go. You know those little action figures they used to make, with those long stretchy limbs? Stretch Armstrong, I think he was called? Yeah, that’s what my last paycheck looks like right about now. So it goes without saying that I’ve been shopping at IKEA. I love its warehouse full of walk-through fantasy rooms and giant collection of cheap throw pillows and wall art. I spend entire afternoons there and emerge with giant blue (reusable!) bags full of stuff and feel pretty good about it, because I rarely spend more than $50 a trip.

 

Then, Ellen Ruppel Shell and Stephanie Zaracheck of Salon had to go and break my heart. According to Zaracheck’s piece titled “IKEA is as bad as Wal-Mart” which discusses Shell’s book Cheap: The High Cost of Discount Culture, IKEA is, well, as bad as Wal-Mart. Despite its progressive, environmentally-friendly vibe and stylish offerings at decent prices, IKEA is perpetuating the same cheap consumerism and commodity fetishism that Wal-Mart does – yes, the very same Wal-Mart that every good liberal boycotted a long time ago.

 

And in fact, IKEA might be worse. Writes Zaracheck, “IKEA is the third-largest consumer of wood in the world and uses timber that comes mostly from Eastern Europe and the Russian Far East, where, Shell points out, ‘wages are low, large wooded regions remote, and according to the World Bank, half of all logging is illegal.’”

 

There’s also the problem of goods that aren’t meant to last. They very quickly clog landfills and leave consumers plunking down cash for replacements, maybe even at the same place they bought the first failed products. There was surely a time when bookshelves that bow after two or three years would convince a consumer to never return to the place where they bought them. Now, it’s expected that goods will disintegrate. And, in a way, this disposability suits our culture: We always want the newest and the latest, the most trendy products. Broken bookshelves are a good justification for going back and getting the newer, better looking ones, and IKEA’s offerings are certainly always consistent with modern design trends, which are as ephemeral as birch veneer.

 

All of this is causing a bit of a crisis for me. Because, as I said, I’m broke. But I also want to “do the right thing.” It’s a tricky spot: I need bookshelves, and I can’t justify spending $500 on a new set. In fact, doing so would make me feel wrong, greedy – we’re in a recession for gosh sakes. The guilt I’d feel at spending $500 when I can’t even pay rent is not worth having real wood bookshelves. (This is certainly a familiar spot for those worse off than me – when poor people buy goods outside of their means, they’re chastised for it, particularly by boot-strap conservatives who would love to go in and make a budget for every poor person in America). And yet, I don’t want to perpetuate cheap goods made for even cheaper by exploited workers.

 

The problem, Shell ultimately concludes and with which I agree, is not necessarily with the consumer. All told, we don’t have much of a choice. If Wal-Mart and IKEA had our best interests at heart, and actually produced quality goods at affordable prices that would maybe lessen the bigwigs’ bonuses but not cause the companies to collapse, then we’d be in a much better buying position.

 

There are some alternatives to dealing with what we’ve got, though. Because there was a time when quality goods were valued, Salvation Army and Goodwill often sells used furniture that has held up quite well for who knows who long. There’s also dumpster diving, Craigslist, yard sales and your parents’ basements. The disposability of our current culture does have its benefits, after all: Some people get tired of things before they are even broken and willingly pass them on to those who will better appreciate them.

 

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # JV097. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause