Jessica
Vozel
Read Jessica's bio and previous columns here
December 29, 2008
Keep Promise on Gay
Rights, And We’ll Forget About Rick Warren
The nation is a couple weeks shy of Barack Obama’s inauguration, and
we’re beginning to see that sometimes the price of trying to unify a
nation is further division. Seemingly fulfilling a promise against
divisiveness, Obama and the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural
Ceremonies invited Saddleback Church’s Rev. Rick Warren to deliver the
invocation at his inauguration ceremony.
Warren, while offering a different brand of politically engaged
Christianity than the Old Guard religious right, has preached against
gay marriage at his Orange County mega church, striking a familiar
evangelical chord by comparing such unions to incest and polygamy. Many
on both sides are not happy about this. Many from the religious right
have sent angry letters and e-mails to Warren, criticizing him for
agreeing to perform an invocation for a man who supports abortion.
Liberals who expected real change see this as a slap in the face – a
more-of-the-same move.
After the blows the gay community has recently received, many argue that
this move was – on Obama’s part – callous, disheartening and even cocky,
as Obama seemed to assume that he was able to, in the words of Frank
Rich, “spend his political capital” in this manner and not be called out
for it. Says gay democratic Congressman Barney Frank of the choice, “I
think he overestimates his ability to get people to put aside
fundamental differences.” Though Americans of all political stripes were
starry-eyed at the time of the election and during the transition
period, we are perhaps entering a new period of pragmatism.
Unifying America sounded great on paper, and Obama was the man to do it.
His multicultural identity and his promise to be an aisle-reacher and a
clear-headed thinker made such unification seem possible. Now, Americans
who believed we could come together are coming to understand that we are
still a nation divided, and Obama is going to make plenty of decisions
in the next four-to-eight years that anger one half of the nation while
satisfying the other. Not every bill to which he puts his pen will be
applauded by the majority of Americans, or even the majority of liberal
Americans.
Obama’s attempts to reach across the aisle will probably cause an uproar
rather than a kumbaya moment of alliance. While many liberals believe he
ran a near-flawless campaign and a laudable transition, they certainly
can’t expect the same of his time in the Oval Office. And let’s be
honest for a second: Obama himself is against gay marriage. Sure,
he never used the insidious terms that Warren did, but their views on
the subject, in terms of the laws they want mandating it, line up.
Warren, to be fair, is not your typical Focus on the Family bigot. He
devotes much of his ministry to eliminating poverty and pioneering
HIV/AIDS relief. He considers social issues like gay marriage and
abortion to be less important, although his views on both are clear.
He’s a popular spiritual figure in America, both for his best-selling
self-help book with a Christian bent, The Purpose Driven Life,
and his role in leading a faith-based election debate, the Saddleback
Forum, this past August. There are worse choices for invocation leader,
but there are better ones too, and it’s a shame that a celebrated moment
in American history has to be marred by serving as a reminder to the gay
community of how far they have yet to go.
Obama has pledged allegiance to LGBTQ Americans, and I want to believe
him. I hope that this concession was merely intended to placate the
homophobes while he brings about the pro-gay legislation he has up his
sleeve. Regardless, inviting Rick Warren to give the invocation is proof
that Obama is willing to make good on his promise to incorporate
dissenting voices. If he fulfills his other promises in the same manner,
things just might get better and this Rick Warren thing will be quickly
forgotten.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # JV073.
Request permission to publish here. |