Read Eric's bio and previous columns
August 3, 2009
From ‘Cash for
Clunkers’ to Profitable Car Companies?
Congress might be rushing through more money for its Cash-for-Clunkers
program, but to call it a success is a bit premature.
There is no disputing that the program has proven more wildly popular
than anticipated. Just a week after the rules for it were laid down, it
ran out of money because more people wanted to participate than anyone
had imagined. This, however, is only a sign of its popularity. Whether
it is a success will come down to whether demand for new automobiles can
The program’s popularity was good news for dealerships and auto
manufacturers, and also its political sponsors. Despite criticisms about
how quickly it ran out of money, mostly which seemed predicated on the
idea that its popularity with consumers is a sign of failure, it turned
out to be more popular than anyone anticipated. That popularity led to a
bill that would flush another $2 billion in the program, which itself
underscores two things that could ultimately make it a failure.
The first is that the auto industry, thanks to it being a big-unit
manufacturing sector, isn’t designed for short-term sprints. It
functions in the big picture. A car represents a significant investment
by consumers, and most normal people don’t go out and stock up when
they’re cheap. Further, one of the problems that auto companies have
faced in changes in consumer taste is that their factories are not
capable of shifting production to new models quickly. Put short, it’s an
industry that depends on long-term, sustainable demand. “Cash for
clunkers” may today be moving cars, but the real health of the auto
industry, and with it American manufacturing, won’t be realized unless
interest among consumers continues after the program expires.
The second and most important is that “Cash for Clunkers” represents a
short-term boost in sales, a kind of mini-bubble that if not sustained
won’t actually represent a better position for automakers. In that way,
it would be the same thing as the bailout for banks, which allowed them
to show better-than-actual fiscal health in the first quarter of this
year. Automakers will indeed be able to show better numbers on their
ledgers thanks to the program, but the sales figures will be inflated
due to a government subsidy of their product.
This means handing the baton off to the automakers, who now find
themselves in the position of having to justify this short-term bailout.
For at least two American automakers – GM and Chrysler – that will be a
substantial order to fill. They’ll have to make good on promises during
their speedy, federally backed bankruptcies that the investment of the
American people was a worthwhile one. They made promises, got the
backing of the administration, and will now have to prove that they can
keep their words. This is especially since one of their biggest owners –
the American people – is very interested in disinvesting.
Much will rest on whether demand for more efficient cars becomes stable.
Currently, demand fluctuates with the price of gasoline. Above about
$3.50 a gallon, consumers go for more efficient vehicles and alter
driving behavior. Below that, consumers don’t much care for efficiency
and don’t care about wasting gasoline in lines waiting for fast food.
will be interesting to see how GM and Chrysler, so soon out of
bankruptcy, try to convert government-stimulated short-term demand into
long-term sustainability. It will be a good test to see whether the
companies can keep their word that federal loans and bankruptcy
assistance will be good investments for the American public, or whether
the companies opted a route of more of the same while in bankruptcy
restructuring. And ultimately, it provides a better answer to whether
this was a true stimulus program, or just a popular one because it
helped people buy cars for cheap.
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
This is Column #
Request permission to publish here.