Read Eric's bio and previous columns


May 11, 2009

Rachel Carson’s DDT Vindication


Were Rachel Carson living today, she’d be looking at her 102nd birthday at the end of this month. As she opened up this morning’s newspaper, she’d see that a movement she helped to inspire is moving toward its ultimate conclusion of a total, worldwide ban of the insecticide DDT.


Despite hyperventilating attacks, some accusing her of crimes against humanity on par with Stalin and Pol Pot, Carson never advocated the abolition of DDT. In fact, the book through which she had her greatest impact, Silent Spring, lays out that curbing human misery and suffering is still primary. The secondary goal was to do so in a way that did not diminish the natural world.


Carson’s solution to insect-borne disease was simple. Rather than relying on chemistry, we also consider solutions that incorporated biology. After all, DDT was not tailor-made for the physiology of one species. For the same reasons it kills mosquitoes, it kills beneficial insects and works its way up the food chain. The result is a spring silent due to the absence of songbirds.


Late last week, a group of nations – and there are many of them – where DDT remains in use moved to make the dream inspired by Carson’s work a final reality. A pledge was signed by those nations to end the use of DDT by 2020.


The momentous nature of this step shouldn’t be overlooked. Malaria still rages in parts of the world, and DDT remains a key component of control strategies. It is natural to cling to things that have aided us in the past. What it signals is the growing awareness of the shortcomings of relying on chemicals like DDT to control disease.


Although some of what Carson wrote about DDT as a threat to human health has turned out to be more weighted in anecdote than in empirical fact, some of her other concerns have turned out to be dead on. Among these, the ability of rapidly reproducing insects to develop resistance to chemical insecticides is perhaps the most important. In the end, it hasn’t been cries from the world’s greens that have put DDT on a course for the ash heap of history, but the ability of mosquitoes to create multiple generations of insects – each slightly more resistant to DDT than the one before – in a very short span of time. Meanwhile, insects and animals that provide a benefit for mankind reproduce much more slowly, which means ultimately much of the damage down to local wildlife is in fact concentrated in animals that provide a positive service.


The solution that has evolved over the years was something straight out of Silent Spring. Rather than looking for that one thing, malaria control strategies have instead become a smorgasbord of the many. Where DDT still works without doing too much harm, it remains in use. In other places, it’s been found that a more effective and affordable strategy is the use of insecticide-treated nets.


Last week’s agreement was itself crafted based on a five-year study of DDT-free malaria control in Mexico and Central America. There, cases of malaria were cut by 60 percent. In addition to the nets and cleaner living conditions, the biological controls first envisioned by Carson were applied – bacteria and fish that prey on mosquitoes.


DDT was actually one of a list of chemicals that the United Nations hopes to stamp out worldwide, but it was given a special waiver. Why? Well, to make room for the very human goal of reducing misery and suffering.


If successful, the program means cutting down on horrible disease in a way that doesn’t demand a trade-off in biodiversity. It will be the result of a realization that modern chemistry can’t provide silver bullets for problems older than mankind. Will Carson ultimately get credit for this broadened way of thinking? First things first: What say we stop calling her an inhuman monster?


© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.


Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.


To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

This is Column # EB108. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
Business Writers
D.F. Krause