Read Eric's bio and previous columns


April 20, 2009

Tea Parties: For Republicans Who Simply Can’t Accept Rejection


Like any good protest, last week’s complaints came in a variety of shapes and sizes and were expressed at varying levels of volume. At the center of it all, at the Tax Day protests, was the heart of not a political movement as had been advertised, but a political party.


Organizers of the Tea Bag protests were quick to point out that the protests themselves were spontaneous, non-partisan demonstrations of taxpayer anger over what they called excessive taxation and reckless government spending. Like all shots taken quickly, they missed, although that was almost certainly intentional. The protesters were almost universally Republicans and conservative.


It is a movement that simply refuses to accept the consequences of defeat. For 20 years, last week’s tea bag protesters have supported a Republican Party that appeared on the brink of turning the appearance of fresh, bold ideas into an unstoppable political juggernaut earlier this decade. When those fresh, bold ideas turned out to be old and flawed, the rest of the country abandoned them for a party that wasn’t preaching policies that everyone recognized had failed badly. This resulted in two straight campaign cycles of failure and defeat for the Republican Party.


It’s important, in terms of perspective, to remember that they weren’t the first for the modern Republican Party. Today’s GOP experienced its first widespread electoral rebuke back in 1998, during mid-term elections that came during the impeachment process for Bill Clinton. Then, as today, a conservative movement that is a great deal less conservative than it is Republican ridiculed polling that showed a great many Americans didn’t support removing a popular president during a time of peace and prosperity on ginned-up charges stemming from marital infidelity.


The fight over Bill Clinton, starting with the hijacking of the national agenda and continuing right through the impeachment proceedings, were first evidence that the conservative movement’s great strength was that it refused to accept what happens when you come up second best. No cost was too great, no avenue was too sacred to run down in order to undo the political expression of the American people in 1992 and 1996. When confronted by negative poll numbers, conservatives insisted that because Clinton never broke 50 percent of the popular vote that he was an unpopular president. When they lost, they said that they’d really won but were foiled by a conspiracy of the media and liberals.


This sentiment, dormant during the Bush years, burst back to the surface last Wednesday. Taking a cue from the days of the 13 colonies, protesters were mad about what they called taxation without representation. A perfect illustration of what they meant came when Daily Show correspondent John Oliver pointed out to a New Jersey protester that they did indeed have representation. The protester said, “They’re not representing our ideas.”


A “never give in, never say die” attitude is quintessentially American. On the other hand, there’s a fine line between refusing to give up and poor sportsmanship. Did last week’s protests cross that line? The answer to that depends on how deeply you interpret the protests themselves to have at their root a common thread questioning whether Barack Obama legitimately won last November’s election based on questions about his birth certificate.


In the larger scheme of things, this is probably less important than what the GOP hopes to do with it. Despite the non-partisan line, the protests were clearly intended to re-energize a political party that appears rudderless and leaderless and whose ideas are badly out of fashion. Even if last week’s protesters represent only a small minority of the nation’s electorate, the GOP right now will take any organized support it can get. And, if it comes from people who won’t accept defeat, for whatever reason, it’s at least something on which there is hope to rebuild.


© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.


Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.


To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

This is Column # EB105. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
Business Writers
D.F. Krause