Read Eric's bio and previous columns
November 3, 2008
Sarah Palin a Disaster, But Who Will Remember?
Sarah Palin really say that criticism of her statements constituted an
assault on her First Amendment rights?
a bit late in the campaign to make much of this, and in fact the
presidential campaigns have entered for all intents and purposes a
period where they are operating on ground game strategy-guided
autopilot. The question that looms is what will happen to the everywoman
hockey mom who blew onto the national stage in September.
Predicting that she plans to stick around is kind of like predicting
that in a couple of months it’ll be colder in the Northern Hemisphere.
It’s something that basically everyone expects to happen, because she
shows every inclination to try to carve out a national presence rather
than returning to Alaska politics.
Historians will probably, unless something dramatic and unexpected
happens Tuesday, identify the selection of Sarah Palin as the moment
John McCain lost. Although it appeared for a few days that the 2008
campaign might be a repeat of the 2000 and 2004 campaigns and be driven
by narratives about things of contemptible unimportance, the economy
picked an opportune moment to collapse.
time when people were worried about their retirement portfolios, Palin’s
candidacy was exposed for the crass political gambit that it was.
reminders have continued since then. There were the disastrous
interviews, which included any time anyone asked her an unscripted
question, and there was the debate in which she declared her intention
to not answer any questions except those she asked herself.
then loosed herself on the campaign trail, whipping up rage and hatred
at McCain rallies that prompted boos for McCain himself when he tried to
simmer it down.
the dust settled from these, it was revealed that the everywoman hockey
mom from rural America was the beneficiary of a donor-funded spending
spree to the tune of more than $100,000.
told a third grader that the vice president runs the Senate, an
interpretation that not only defies American history but the analysis of
basically every normal constitutional scholar. That brought us to last
week’s declaration that criticism that she had made the presidential
campaign too personal and negative was an assault on her First Amendment
you combine those two, in fact, what you come away with is a
vice-presidential candidate who believes she should do whatever she
wishes to do as vice president and who is not subject to criticism in
the nation’s media.
breathtakingly ignorant, arrogant and also dangerous.
problem is that time has a way of glossing over these things. In fact,
this was one of Hillary Clinton’s strengths this year. She’s been in the
public eye for so long and absorbed so many hits from her political
opponents that it was literally impossible to come up with something
that might break through the, “Oh, yes, you hate Hillary Clinton . . .
could be that Palin finds enough support in what remains of the
Republican Party to keep her chances limping along, through the years,
until people feel charitable enough toward her to forget the horrifying
performance she gave this year and she becomes experienced enough not to
repeat it. The media’s institutional memory is short enough to forget
all by the worst errors.
rumors are true that Palin is first and foremost about herself, then she
already possesses the most important qualification to serve in the
presidency – she really, really wants it. The race doesn’t usually go to
the smartest or the most experienced, but instead to the one who wants
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
This is Column #
Request permission to publish here.