ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS •  NEWS/EVENTS • FORUM • ORDER FORM • RATES • MANAGEMENT • CONTACT

David

Karki

 

 

Read David's bio and previous columns here

 

July 8, 2009

The Last Independence Day?

 

Last weekend many of us celebrated the 233rd anniversary of the passage of the Declaration of Independence, the profound document stating the timeless principles upon which our nation is founded and our lifestyle depends. Thomas Jefferson's words still ring as true today as they did in 1776:

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

 

Perhaps they resonate so freshly because now, as then, we are faced with someone who views the Declaration as well as the Constitution – which is the legal codification of the above principles – as something to be disdained and disregarded. To the extent the founding documents are acknowledged, it's as an annoying obstacle to be gotten over and around in the pursuit of power and the forcible implementation of a different worldview, not as hard limits on government power, which must be respected for the sake of the liberty of us all.

 

Example: The House's ramrod passage of the “cap and tax” bill, which is nothing less than outright totalitarianism thinly disguised in a cloak of environmentalism – as if government could ever possibly affect the climate or weather anyway.

 

Example: The Obama Administration's despicable support of one authoritarian dictator after another – Iran, Honduras, Venezuela, etc. – when the people of those nations want no part of them.

 

The Iranian people took to the streets after a blatantly stolen election, heroically putting their lives on the line in hopes that someone might help them take down the world's worst regime before it obtained nuclear weapons. They bled and died for freedom, and should have been an inspiration to us all. But sadly, Obama is allied with the other side.

 

In Honduras, President Manuel Zelaya was term-limited out of office, but illegally tried to stay beyond that. Their Supreme Court ruled him out of line and their military forced him to leave. Naturally, Obama took the side of the blatantly despotic Zelaya, and the state-run media reported this as a “coup,” when it was simply the enforcement of Article 374 of the Honduran constitution. There, as here, the military takes an oath to uphold the document against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They don't swear loyalty to a person. And we've all just seen the good reason why.

 

Moreover, the president who ran his mouth during the election about how much President Bush had supposedly hurt America's image abroad has managed to infuriate the populations of both Iran and Honduras by being on the wrong side of both situations. Far from building friendships, he's needlessly and stupidly creating enmity by supporting these thugs.

 

Why would Obama so consistently find kinship with the likes of Zelaya, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez and so on? Could it be that he harbors similar desires here, for us? Could it be that he can't very well support peoples wanting freedom abroad when he's simultaneously trying to remove ours here at home – as evidenced by the cap and tax and health care bills, both of which would utterly annihilate the private sector and individual freedom?

 

I certainly hope we don't have to repeat the events that followed the passage of the Declaration, but the main way to avoid it is constant vigilance. And I fear that having been a bit soft in that regard has opened the door to a repetition being much more likely than it was just a few months ago. Clearly, there is much in the way Obama is behaving to give those of us who still value what the Declaration embodies – and let's not fool ourselves into thinking that there are as many with such a mindset as there once were – reason for great pause.

 

I hope you enjoyed the barbecues and fireworks, but keep in mind what it will take to keep commemorating Independence Day in the years to come, and not have it be turned into Dependence Day.

        

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

This is Column # DKK188. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Bob Franken
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause