David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
June 1, 2009
The End of the Auto
Industry . . . and America
They can have any
color they want, so long as it's black. Henry Ford
They can have any
car they want, so long as it's a tiny hybrid death trap. President
Obama
OK, so President Obama
didn't actually say that in so many words. But that's what his
unilateral raising of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards
effectively does.
For all practical
purposes, the production of SUVs and trucks has been outlawed. There is
simply no way to manufacture a bigger, heavier vehicle that can meet
those standards. Therefore, they won't be manufactured.
In their place will be
mini-Cooper-sized hybrid compacts made of metal only slightly more
resistant to crushing on impact than your average soda can. They'll be
more expensive to make and cost more to buy and maintain, effectively
making the new standards a massive tax increase. And they will be lethal
more people will be killed because lighter-weight metal will not
protect occupants as effectively in a crash.
No one wants these
glorified Flintstones cars. Were there profit in it, someone would
already be making and selling lots of them. No thuggish orders from
Obama and his EPA would be necessary. But that's not the case. In fact,
the very vehicle lines Obama just terminated were Detroit's most
profitable. And it makes sense. An SUV can comfortably carry a family
and their stuff and protect them during the trip. The new Obamobiles
can't do any of that.
But then Obama has
never let reality get in the way of his hubris. Little things like the
immutable laws of economics and physics, and the integrity of contracts,
are nothing in the face of his bill- and regulation-signing pen. Obama
will outlaw the most profitable good product, force the sale of an
unwanted bad product, wave a magic wand to instantly change how
efficiently gasoline burns and ignore any legally binding agreement he
feels like, and we'll suffer no deleterious consequences for his
delusions of grandeur.
Please. This is insane.
And does anyone even care anymore about where in hell Obama thinks he
gets the constitutional authority to do any of this? I certainly don't
see Article II containing anything about the president having the power
to appoint himself CEO of the auto industry.
And then there's his
forced closures of dealerships and unilateral voiding of bankruptcy
contracts with regard to General Motors and Chrysler. He has screwed the
holders of those companies' debt out of the payments to which they have
a legal right, protected by the Contracts clause of the Constitution.
(Obama took an oath to preserve, protect and defend that, in case you've
forgotten.) He got them to the White House, offered them 22 cents on
the dollar to shut up and go away, and when they objected he started
publicly denigrating them as greedy.
He has also closed
hundreds of dealerships, many quite successful, on very spurious
grounds. I'm not sure if he's just selecting them that poorly as he
incompetently tries to run an industry he can't possibly understand and
had no business touching in the first place, or if there is a more
sinister reason behind which got the axe. But I feel safe in thinking
that politics played a much bigger role than the financial bottom line.
And that politics, that
method to the erstwhile madness, is this: Obama, at the behest of the
enviro-wacko lobby, wants to force the outright end of the auto industry
in America as we've known it.
The tree huggers have
long believed that the internal combustion engine is the most
destructive invention in mankind's history as a pestilence on Mother
Earth. Al Gore ranked it ahead of the atomic bomb in his green polemic,
Earth in the Balance. And now, with a like-minded eco-nut in
Obama and no opposition whatsoever, they have the ability to make their
screwed-up vision a screwed-up reality.
Moreover, the
means by which Obama is doing so is nothing short of fascist. Webster's
defines it as follows: A political regime that
exalts nation above the individual and that stands for a centralized
autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic
and/or social regimentation, and suppression of opposition.
There isn't a single
part of this definition that doesn't fit: Exalts nation (or collective)
above the individual? Check. Obama is handing whatever is left of GM and
Chrysler to the unions and screwing debt holders.
Centralized autocratic
government? Check. GM and Chrysler are now owned by government. Banking
preceded them, and credit cards are to immediately follow. And it won't
stop there.
A dictatorial leader?
Check. Obama voids legal contracts, bullies and threatens industry
leaders who stand up to him or get in the way of his goals.
Severe economic
regimentation? Check. Obama the Car Czar is dictating through regulation
every last detail of what Detroit will manufacture.
Suppression of
opposition? Check. Uses the good-cop/bad-cop ploy on debt holders,
offering a small amount of what they're due if they comply and
slandering them (and threatening them with even worse, according to one
of their attorneys) if they don't.
Obama keeps up a
thin veneer of supposed private ownership, the better to hide his
heavy-handed thuggery. But to quote Ronald Reagan: Now
it doesn't require expropriation or confiscation of private property or
business to impose socialism on a people. What does it mean whether you
hold the deed or the title to your business or property if the
government holds the power of life and death over that business or
property?
When Obama can void
contracts, close dealerships, mandate and abolish product lines, all on
his personal whim with no due process of law, we not only have seen the
end of the auto industry but of America itself.
© 2009
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK182.
Request
permission to publish here. |