David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
October 6, 2008
McCain Needs to
Fight Harder Than This
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
more than held her own against Sen. Joe Biden Thursday night, putting to
rest any further doubts about her ability to hang with the big boys. She
was likeable and energetic, connected with viewers and provided a good
contrast with the older, slightly tired-looking lifelong senator.
Insofar as intangibles go, she won going away.
And yet, when it came
to substance, I don't think much changed. Biden, for his part, held his
own in that regard. He got out all the usual Democratic talking points
to satiate the base, and hit Sen. John McCain with some solid liberal
criticisms. Palin didn't respond to most of them, nor to several
contradictory statements Biden made within the debate itself. She left a
good many opportunities to zing Biden and Obama on the table, unused.
Just one example: Biden
insisted that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down
unconditionally with Iranian dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The fact is,
Obama did say that (check it out on
You Tube) and proudly declared it on his
website, which said “Obama is the only candidate that supports
tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.”
Blatant falsehoods like
that have to be called out, especially when the biggest TV audience of
the entire campaign is watching. It's the only chance they'll ever have
to go over the top of the pro-Obama media and break through the shield
of protection they've placed over him. To see Palin not take advantage
of this and many other good openings that Biden served up was
disappointing, to say the least.
To be sure, some of
this is due to the fact that she's speaking for McCain, and it's the
vice president's role to support the top of the ticket. And since he's
not been a solid conservative for quite some time, it would be
contradictory for her to be so now. That much is understandable.
Still, it would have be
nice to see her link the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac scandals to the
Democrats who caused it – Rep. Barney Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd, among
others – and then point out that Obama was the second-biggest recipient
of donations from those just-bailed-out institutions, or say anything
else that might have inflicted some lasting, memorable damage to which
the Obama campaign would have been forced to respond.
But that didn't happen.
Palin will provide a needed shot in the arm, a boost of adrenaline to a
campaign that had begun to flag a little bit. But this will be forgotten
in a few days' time. In the end, it's going to be up to McCain himself
to keep this thing going, and not let it drift into an incoherent
mishmash of left, right and center. (And can we please stop using the
word “maverick”? It's lost all power it may have ever had thanks to
being beaten into the ground so relentlessly.) Voters ultimately choose
based on the top of the ticket, not the bottom.
There needs to be a
narrative of some kind that people can latch onto, and it needs to be
driven home. The Democrats have one, untrue to the point of delusion,
completely Marxist and riddled with obsessive backward-looking Bush-hate
though it is. And they have the biased mainstream media to shout it for
them all day, every day. This would not be easy to beat, even for a
solid conservative who is an especially good speaker.
For McCain, who is
neither, it will be extremely tough. And while I hope I am wrong in this
assessment, he's been looking entirely too much like Bob Dole '96 for
comfort as of late. Perhaps the town-hall format of the next debate,
which McCain would have them all be if he could, will prove a
jump-starter.
Whatever the angle he
takes, and whatever the style, the main thing is that McCain has to go
on maximum offense, by whatever definition the McCain campaign may have
for it. This bipartisan, getting along, “reaching out to his friends
across the aisle” stuff is going to get him defeated because his
opponent's vast weaknesses will go unexploited as a result. Meanwhile,
his own weaknesses will be getting hammered daily and relentlessly. This
sort of thing adds up in a hurry.
Not to mention that it
deflates the base's enthusiasm in a way that even Palin can't entirely
make up for. And this is a base that has never been particularly
comfortable about having McCain as its ostensible standard-bearer. Yet
he seems bound and determined to run as far to the left as possible, to
the point of voting for this monstrosity of a bailout bill – and
throwing away his clearest advantage in the process, by staying silent
on the dozens of pork-barrel earmarks attached to it. The credibility he
had on that issue has taken a major self-inflicted hit as a result.
Governor Palin has
demonstrated what it will take to fire up the electorate to vote
Republican this fall. I only hope McCain can shake off his
inside-the-Beltway conventional wisdom for the next month to see that he
must go with the former and not the latter if he is to win the
presidency.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK145.
Request
permission to publish here. |