David
Karki
Read David's bio and previous columns here
September 15, 2008
Nancy Pelosi: The
Millstone Hung Round Obama's Neck
I suppose that after
the selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as John McCain’s
vice-presidential running mate, I should neither doubt the McCain
campaign brain trust nor presume to know better than they how to win an
election. Nevertheless, there is an avenue that would appear to be very
fruitful which they, up until this point at least, seem to be neglecting
– save for one mention in Palin's convention speech.
And that is to take
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the least-popular in history Democratic-run
Congress, and hang them around Barack Obama's neck.
There are several big
advantages to this, not the least of which is that it fits perfectly
into the McCain/Palin narrative of real change. Real change from what?
From the last two years of Democratic mismanagement, which far too few
people even know has existed. A lot of folks still think Republicans run
the show, and given how that majority came to an end, it's hard to blame
them. In some ways the two have been indistinguishable. But in the ways
that matter in this election, they are different and that needs to be
made known.
Prime amongst this is
energy and drilling. This issue will quickly be front and center, as the
ban on domestic drilling expires in just two weeks, on September 30. All
that has to happen is for the calendar to run out and leases can be
issued again. Naturally, Speaker Pelosi is determined to prevent that,
and will force a vote on a bill that pretends to expand drilling but
really does nothing of the sort, and which completely gives away the
farm in the process.
That will be followed
in short order by a continuing resolution to keep the federal government
from shutting down on October 1, since the Do-Nothing Democratic
Congress hasn't seen fit to even try passing a budget, so convinced are
they that Obama will be inaugurated in January and sign off on
everything they can't get past President Bush's veto. This resolution
will contain a renewal of the drilling ban.
In both cases, Bush
will veto and the GOP will have the votes to sustain it. The government
will shut down, and the Democratic screaming and demogoging will
commence, accusing the heartless Republicans of starving children to
enrich Big Oil. In fact, the opposite is the case. Democrats are holding
everything hostage for the sake of stopping drilling, at the behest of
the radical environmentalist lobby (or should I say “Big Green”).
This is where the
opening lies, both to expose Pelosi and make her an unbearable but
inescapable burden to Obama. For such subordination of America's best
interests to the demands of liberal lobbies is Pelosi's habit, from
energy to single-handedly killing the Colombian trade agreement at the
behest of the AFL-CIO.
John McCain should make
it crystal clear that the election of Obama/Biden, who both somehow have
voting records as far or even further left than San Fran Nan (as utterly
unfathomable as that is), would effectively create the Pelosi
Administration. She and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would run the
show, as Obama sits by rubber-stamping all the ultra-liberal junk they
trowel out. This, in turn, would mean that Big Labor, Big Green, the
trial lawyer lobby, the National Association for Women and the National
Education Association would be dictating policy.
McCain should not
hesitate to portray Obama/Biden as a Pelosi/Reid lackey. First, based on
voting records, it's absolutely the truth. All four are as liberal as
they come. Second, if Obama complains about it, then challenge him on
where he'd differ with Pelosi/Reid, and ask what items of theirs he'd
veto. His answer will either prove the charge or anger the Democratic
base, which is a win-win situation.
Third, it presents the
opportunity to not-so-gently remind voters that Democrats have been in
charge the last two years, during which time gas prices have
skyrocketed, amongst other things that have led to 9 Percent Nancy's
unpopularity. Affix the blame directly where it belongs, point out that
Obama would open the floodgates for much more and much worse, and hammer
home the message that to change from this, you must vote for
McCain/Palin.
McCain's record of
bucking his own party helps insulate against the charge that he was part
of that Congress, as does Obama and Biden both also having been there –
and part of that Democratic majority, no less. Palin's presence also
adds credibility to that end.
It would be nice if the
McCain campaign and GOP congressional leadership could coordinate on
this and speak with one clear voice to cut through the media spin, as
well as to try to jump-start any chance Republicans might have to gain
seats this year. McCain provided a solid starting point with the mea
culpas in his convention acceptance speech, but the public will
understandably be very skeptical that the GOP has learned its lesson.
Whether or not that's
feasible, the McCain camp can and should still do this themselves. It's
good politics, it's the truth and it's the real functional choice in
this election – a McCain presidency, or a de facto Pelosi one.
Presented that way, the choice ought to be a no-brainer.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # DKK142.
Request
permission to publish here. |