ABOUT US  • COLUMNISTS   NEWS/EVENTS  FORUM ORDER FORM RATES MANAGEMENT CONTACT

Dan

Calabrese

 

 

Read Dan's bio and previous columns here

 

August 31, 2009

Reeling Obama: I Know! I’ll Pick Another Fight With Dick Cheney!

 

What’s a reeling president to do when his signature policy proposal is at death’s door and the public is growing skeptical of his ability to lead?

 

Pick another fight with Dick Cheney! Because that worked out really well the last time, didn’t it?

 

President Obama, who continues to misunderstand the nation that elected him (and why it did so), now owns the decision of Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint special counsel to investigate the CIA’s torture of terrorism suspects – who for some reason wouldn’t tell interrogators what they knew when they were asked nicely.

 

Of course, Obama insists he had nothing to do with Holder’s decision, since it goes against his statement early on in his presidency that he didn’t want to do any such thing. Then again, Holder knows well that Obama is his boss. But hey, Obama had nothing to do with it, and it’s not like Obama would B.S. us.

 

Cheney, who has nothing to lose and nothing to fear, wasted no time firing back. (Remember when this nation had leaders who took the same approach to foreign enemies? Like, last year?) He told Fox News Sunday that if the Obama Administration was serious about preventing terrorism, it would be debriefing – rather than investigating – the CIA interrogators who were part of a seven-year track record of preventing any and all terrorist attacks post-9/11.

 

But they’re not serious, and they don’t think the public is serious either.

 

This is the same reason Obama stopped using the term “war on terror,” and even went so far as to have his appointees use silly terms like “man-made disasters” as politically correct euphemisms for terrorist attacks. It would appear Obama reads the New York Times and the Associated Press and thinks the sentiments contained therein represent those of ordinary Americans.

 

These sentiments would be summed up as follows:

 

  • We’re tired of all the talk of “terrorism” by people who are just trying to scare us into accepting their illegal war!
  • It’s time to end the horrific tactics that have squandered the goodwill we enjoyed across the globe after 9/11!
  • We’ve had enough of our personal liberties being violated under the guise of national security!

 

The public’s supposed embrace of such ideas, Obama surmises, must be why the American people elected him – because they want a Jimmy Carter-type egghead who is weak on national security and apologetic about all of America’s arrogant sins.

 

No.

 

About 53 percent of the American electorate chose Obama because a little more half the independents who voted for George W. Bush last time bought the media narrative that Republicans had ruined everything by fighting an unnecessary war and unleashing ruinous free-market economic policies on the nation (if only), leading to worldwide economic collapse.

 

That, and they thought it would be cool to be able to say they helped put an “articulate” black guy in the White House. That’s it. These same independents, far from committed to any particular governing philosophy, are the same people who are now losing faith in the president because they didn’t want a massive federal spending explosion, they didn’t want government-run health care and they didn’t want a president who slaps skin with anti-American thugs abroad while trying to turn our own national security personnel into criminals.

 

So why didn’t they think about that before they voted? Ah, independents. Such a whimsical bunch. It seemed like such a cool idea at the time!

 

As for the rest of the nation, Obama vs. Cheney II is likely to yield the same result as the last time Obama tried this gambit, when opposition to the closing of Guantanamo Bay’s terrorist prison began its ascent toward its now-lofty heights of more than 50 percent.

 

Cheney is unpopular until he actually speaks up in his own defense, and people realize that when you’re serious about national security, you do what you have to do. And as the Washington Post reported last week, it gets results.

 

Having failed to learn his lesson the first time, Obama is now going to try to criminalize the serious pursuit of American national security. The America he pictures in his mind will love such a move. The real one will find itself with one more reason to wonder why it elected such a ridiculous president – and if it really had good reasons for so disliking the last one.

    

© 2009 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.

 

Become Dan's friend on Facebook.

 

To book Dan as a speaker for your group's event, contact Lourdes Swarts at Speakers Access.

 

Click here to talk to our writers and editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.

 

To e-mail feedback about this column, click here. If you enjoy this writer's work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry it.

 

This is Column # DC311. Request permission to publish here.

Op-Ed Writers
Eric Baerren
Lucia de Vernai
Herman Cain
Dan Calabrese
Lawrence J. Haas
Paul Ibrahim
David Karki
Llewellyn King
Gregory D. Lee
David B. Livingstone
Bob Maistros
Rachel Marsden
Nathaniel Shockey
Stephen Silver
Candace Talmadge
Jessica Vozel
Jamie Weinstein
 
Cartoons
Brett Noel
Feature Writers
Mike Ball
Bob Batz
Cindy Droog
The Laughing Chef
David J. Pollay
 
Business Writers
D.F. Krause
 
CONSERVATIVE T-SHIRTS!
"Torture Then, Torture Now" Starring Joe Biden
 
Plus: "New Obama Tax Form"
 
Click here to order!