Dan
Calabrese
Read Dan's bio and previous columns here
July 27, 2009
Health Care Collapsing
Because Obama Doesn’t Know How to Govern
Democrats are starting to discover what Republicans should keep in mind
the next time they get about the business of nominating a candidate for
president: Ideology and electability, while important, are overrated –
and governing ability is vastly underrated.
President Obama’s collapsing health care initiative is Exhibit A. The
left loved Obama during last year’s primary campaign, far more than it
loved establishment pick Hillary Clinton, because Obama was an
appealing, pure ideological liberal. Surely, this was a guy who would
have no hesitation getting behind a whole host of left-wing policies.
A
government takeover of health care has long been at the top of that
list, and sure enough, Obama jumped right in with a monstrosity of a
bill. He insisted the Democratic-controlled Congress pass it before its
August recess, and with huge majorities in both chambers, including a
filibuster-proof one in the Senate, the left’s fondest dream finally
appeared inevitable.
Now we know there will be no vote on health care until at least the
fall, and given the direction of public opinion and the nervousness of
Democrats on Capitol Hill, it’s at best an even bet that anything at all
passes. Worse for Obama, if it doesn’t happen this year, it will likely
never happen, as Democrats are not going to get behind a socialized
medicine bill in a mid-term election year and risk the kind of
Republican tidal wave that swept so many of them out of office in 1994.
Obama is at serious risk of seeing health care “reform” collapse
entirely. So how has he managed to put himself at risk of such a
monumental failure when all the numbers seemed to favor his success?
Because he doesn’t know how to govern.
This was easy for his supporters to ignore during the campaign,
especially when Democrats have traditionally had such a hard time
winning the White House, and Obama was clearly on a path to victory. Any
time someone brought up his complete lack of executive decision-making
experience, it was argued that he would simply surround himself with
good people and he would have no problem.
As
my colleague Herman Cain pointed out in a recent column, Obama has
certainly surrounded himself with a lot of people – 69 of them
reporting directly to him. Herman, an experienced CEO, pointed out to me
when discussing that column that the ideal number of people to report to
a CEO even in a big organization is considered to be seven by those who
study management. The absolute highest number is 15, and that’s for a
very experienced CEO whose management team is completely free of hidden
agendas and paranoia. That’s almost impossible to find, even in the
private sector, let alone in government.
So
a chief executive with no experience whatsoever, dealing with 69 direct
reports, is a guaranteed disaster – even before you mix in the bad
policy ideas.
Obama is also failing to govern effectively because he is approaching
policy initiatives with legacy in mind, rather than serious
problem-solving that really brings improvement. Left-wingers desperately
want the government to run health care, and they learned in 1994 that,
even in the event one of them becomes president with a Democratic
majority in Congress, there is a very short window of opportunity to do
this.
So
even though the economy is horrible and federal spending is already out
of control, Obama wanted more than anything else to be the president who
finally got it done – knowing this would make him a left-wing icon on
the order of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. That’s why he tried to cram the
bill into a very tight calendar. That’s why he abdicated leadership and
let the worst of the Capitol Hill Democrats write the bill. That’s why
he failed to think it through and couldn’t keep Blue Dog Democrats on
board.
Governing is a skill entirely apart from ideological purity or
electability. Just because a candidate stands for the things you stand
for doesn’t mean he can actually get them done. You have to know how to
craft policy, know how shepherd it through Congress, know how to align
your policy prescriptions with the needs of the public, anticipate
unintended consequences and have a strategy for dealing with them.
You also have to know how to lead and direct your executive team so it
stands ready not only to get your plan through Congress, but also how to
execute it once it becomes law.
Obama doesn’t know how to do any of this. He does not know how to
govern. This will come as good news to conservatives, who now see the
worst of his policy ideas going down in flames. But it should also serve
as a cautionary tale. If the next Republican nominee is a “true
conservative” who supports all the things conservatives want, but
doesn’t possess the skill to govern effectively, conservatives will be
left feeling as hollow and frustrated as liberals feel right now.
You can stand for anything. It’s not worth a bucket of warm spit if you
can’t actually get it done.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Become
Dan's friend on Facebook.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DC302. Request permission to publish here. |