Dan
Calabrese
Read Dan's bio and previous columns here
May 7, 2009
So, Closing
Guantanamo’s Not Such a Good Idea After All
It’s actually somewhat encouraging that President Obama can recognize
reality when it smacks him in the face, and that he can shift directions
accordingly – as he is now doing on the matter of the Guantanamo Bay
terrorist prison and the associated military tribunals.
It’s also freaking hilarious. So let us give the president credit for
not pursuing this particular recklessly irresponsible path, even as we
laugh ourselves silly at him for ever having promised to change the
highly effective policies the Bush Administration had put in place.
Obama campaigned on the notion that Guantanamo was little more than a
torture chamber where sadistic Americans lived out their sick fantasies
at the expense of poor, innocent Middle Eastern gentlemen who had been
just standing around bothering no one when blood-thirsty U.S. troops
pointed rifles at their heads and ordered them onto the U.S.S. Dick
Cheney for a little ride.
Poor souls.
Even worse, he bemoaned that the evil military commissions supposedly
denied these fine gentlemen the due process to which they were not even
entitled as non-U.S. citizens and enemy combatants.
So
once he became president, one of Obama’s first actions was to sign an
executive order directing that Guantanamo be closed within a year and
that the detainees be moved elsewhere. Where? Oh, they’d figure that out
soon enough, and they surely wouldn’t subject them to judgment at the
hands of the evil military commissions.
It’s a funny thing – reality. When you’re running for president, those
guys at Guantanamo can be pretty much anything you want them to be. And
if you want them to be poor innocent victims of the sinister Bush
Administration, hey, put it in the speech! The crowds will love it and
the media won’t question you.
But when you become president, a couple things happen under the category
of reality slapping you in the face. First, all that classified
information that tells you what the dudes really did, and why they’re
really there? Yeah, they give those to you now. So you start
putting two and two together and figuring out what will happen if you
release the kind souls – especially if you bring them onto U.S. soil,
have them tried in federal court by prosecutors who can’t use classified
information as evidence, and then release them onto the streets of
Topeka, Kansas.
And once you have realized all this, you say to yourself, “Oh $#(*@!”
And you announce that the “study” you are conducting to figure out what
to do will take a little longer than you first thought. Then you try to
figure out how to go back to doing exactly what Bush was doing – because
it’s the only responsible thing you could possibly do – but make it look
like you changed it enough so that it’s really different.
How does one explain such a disparity between what candidate Obama said
and what President Obama is going to do? Why, you laud his
open-mindedness and adaptability! Here is how Paul Rothstein, a
Georgetown law professor, put it:
"Once you become president and see the whole panoply of issues that you
face, some of the things that seemed easy to promise or talk about
during the campaign sometimes appear more difficult. Elections are
fought on big slogans without much nuance or detail. I think we want a
president who responds to what he sees when he actually gets in there
and sees the whole picture, rather than one who adheres rigidly to what
he said before."
Translation: It’s a good thing he isn’t keeping the promises he made
during the campaign, because he obviously didn’t have the slightest idea
what he was talking about – as I seem to recall one or two of us may
have suspected at the time.
As
for the fate of Guantanamo itself, well, Obama did order it closed
within a year. Then again, Obama’s been known to “delay” the
implementation of decisions once he realizes how dumb they were. Will
Guantanamo ever really close? We’ll see. In the meantime, at least we
know our president won’t see a decision through, come hell or high
water, once it becomes obvious it’s a disaster.
That is not much, but given the caliber of the people we’re dealing with
here, at least it’s something.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DC279. Request permission to publish here. |