Dan
Calabrese
Read Dan's bio and previous columns here
April 16, 2009
And Now, the U.S.
Department of Auto Manufacturing
Did you wonder at all, when the federal government decided to lend
General Motors $13.4 billion to help it avoid bankruptcy, just how the
feds expected to be repaid? Did it occur to you that the solution for a
debt-strapped, cash-bleeding company might not be to put it $13.4
billion further into debt?
Or
did you think, well, of course the federal government knows it will
never see that money again? They just can’t say so while they’re giving
in to the too-big-to-fail sentiment surrounding GM.
At
any rate, it’s now becoming increasingly clear that the federal
government has bought itself a car company. Since GM can’t manage its
$28 billion debt to bondholders, and can’t come up with the $20 billion
it still owes to the United Auto Workers to bankroll the fund that was
supposed to take retiree health care “off the books,” there’s clearly no
way it can pay back $13.4 billion to Uncle Sam.
So
while the bondholders get stuck with around nine cents on the dollar,
and the UAW gets some sort of ill-defined promise of payments over 20
years along with worthless stock, guess what the federal government is
going to get! You, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, are about to become the proud
owners of 20 percent of General Motors.
Now you may be a tad stressed over the fact that GM stock has lost 93
percent of its value in the past year. That is, of course, if you’re not
hung up on the fact that the federal government has no business owning a
car company in the first place.
But if you’ve really followed the misadventures of the U.S. auto
industry, you would understand that one of two outcomes was inevitable.
Either GM was going to collapse under the weight of its own
unsustainable business model, or it was going to become a quasi-public
utility. It has already operated for years more like a public utility
than like a for-profit, private-sector company.
GM’s primary stock-in-trade has long been politics. Years ago, GM gave
up on the notion that its labor force should accept a wage structure
that would permit the company to profitably sell products that people
wanted to buy. Instead, it accepted arcane work rules, a bloated pay
structure and mind-bogglingly generous retiree benefits. This bought GM
two things it wanted. One was labor peace. The other was political
clout.
Even as the company began to recognize its failings in the areas of
product development and financial management, it knew it could appeal to
political and media luminaries to save it for the sake of the many
workers, suppliers and retirees who would find themselves beyond despair
if GM failed. And if that wasn’t enough, GM could appeal on behalf of
the many towns that depended on property tax revenue from GM plants to
fund their local police and fire departments and school systems.
Today’s shrieks of horror over CEO Rick Wagoner’s ouster at the
insistence of the president of the United States fail to recognize that
it has been a very long time since GM’s primary mission was to generate
profit via the free market.
The federal government’s willingness to accept GM stock in lieu of debt
repayment means the taxpayers will have an increasingly important stake
in the now-inevitable bankruptcy. (And no matter what they call it, it
will be bankruptcy.) One line of thinking is to separate the
“good” GM from the “bad” GM. The idea here is that elements of GM that
can make a profit – lines like Chevrolet, Buick and Cadillac – will
emerge quickly while everything else, from unprofitable lines to
irresolvable liabilities, will remain tied up in court for
God-knows-how-long.
Well! The government is in the car business all right! Why hasn’t the
rest of business world thought of this? Take the parts of your company
that are making money, and keep them. Take the other parts, and, uh,
just launch them into outer space or something. Brilliant! Instant
profitability for everyone, forever.
You know why nations have economic problems? Because they can’t accept
the fact that the failure of ridiculous companies with dumb business
models is a good and necessary thing. GM should fail. Companies who make
good decisions should be allowed to fill the resulting gap with their
growth and prosperity. The economy would be on a more solid footing if
this happened.
Instead, we are about to inaugurate the new U.S. Department of Auto
Manufacturing. And before you wax indignant about President Obama’s
sinister takeover of industry, you should remember that it was GM itself
that came hat-in-hand to Washington to start this ball rolling, while
lots of people at all points on the political spectrum cheered it on.
Good luck with the new venture, U.S. taxpayers. You’ll need it. Boy,
will you need it.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DC273. Request permission to publish here. |