data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed0f/5ed0fad6747e0acbaf80279ea8d0a30f85eb3409" alt=""
Dan
Calabrese
Read Dan's bio and previous columns here
January 6, 2009
If We Can Turn Bacteria
Into Fuel (And Someone Just Did), What Else is Possible?
American energy independence may be closer than anyone realizes, and one
of the most promising sources is neither wind nor solar nor oil nor coal
nor even nuclear – as useful as all of the above may be in their own
right.
It
is biomass, especially bacteria – genetically manipulated to produce
hydrocarbon fuels like gasoline and diesel. I wrote about this in May
2008, and in the eight months since then the people involved have made
so much progress that a major announcement is scheduled for next week in
Washington D.C.
My prior column explained the efforts of Tifton, Georgia-based Bell
BioEnergy to develop hydrocarbon fuel from biomass materials, especially
bacteria. The idea was to convert biomass in the same way that termites
do when they digest their food. Owner J.C. Bell told me he was working
on the technology that could use this process to produce even
sophisticated fuels like gasoline and diesel.
Just in the past three weeks, Bell BioEnergy has successfully produced
both gasoline and diesel in its laboratory using residual biomass waste
from bacteria. Its progress has so impressed the Pentagon that
representatives from the Army will be present next Thursday, January 15,
when Bell announces the breakthrough. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss
(R-Georgia) will also take part in the announcement.
(Disclosure: My North Star Writers Group colleague Herman Cain is an
investor in Bell BioEnergy and provided information for this column,
although he had no such stake – and had not even heard of Bell BioEnergy
– when I wrote my previous column on the subject. I have no financial
stake in the company or the technology. I wish I did.)
The Pentagon’s interest is to secure an energy source that is not
dependent on foreign sources, particularly ones that are not always all
that friendly to the United States. To that end, now that Bell has
successfully shown it can produce gas and diesel in the laboratory, the
Army plans to grant Bell access to seven of its bases to use as
demonstration test units. The first has already been built at the Fort
Stewart Army Base in Savannah, Georgia. Bell is financing the
construction and operation of the test units, but the Army is providing
logistical support, security and biomass input.
The challenge for Bell at this point is to show that it can perfect the
speed and specificity of each of the bacteria such that it can produce
these fuels in mass quantities. The goal is to produce the fuels by the
billions of gallons, and the eventual goal is to operate as many as 500
production facilities – all using the perpetually renewable raw material
of bacteria for the production of the same hydrocarbon fuels we get
today from fossils deep in the ground, mostly from other countries.
This is still a long way from success, and much could go wrong during
the upcoming phases. But there’s a larger lesson in what Bell is doing
here. To listen to sky-is-falling people in the environmental movement
and elsewhere, you’d think it’s a foregone conclusion that America has
to give up its lifestyle – its cars, its comfortably heated homes and
the entire notion of nationwide transport of goods. Even our incoming
president said during the campaign that Americans can no longer heat
their homes to 72 degrees because other countries won’t permit us to do
so.
The “drill baby drill” movement of the past year – so compelling when
gas prices soared above $4 a gallon – spoke to the undeniable reality
that we can’t keep depending on foreign oil sources. Much of the left,
which doesn’t want us to use oil, scoffed that America doesn’t have
enough of its own oil, and at any rate it could never get to it quickly
enough to make a difference.
All this failed to foresee the promise of technology and innovation.
Just as the ability to make fuel out of decomposing fossils was once
unimaginable, necessity will likely be the mother of invention again,
and someone will develop a new way to make it. Perhaps Bell BioEnergy is
that someone. Perhaps Bell will fail. But someone will do it,
because it needs to be done. And even the progress Bell has made to
date, limited though it is, proves that the concept is not fanciful.
We
still need to drill, baby, drill, but it is probably true that there are
limits to the long-term benefits of doing so. It is also true that we
shouldn’t use any energy source wastefully – not even one that is
plentiful and renewable.
But there’s every reason to believe that America can meet its own energy
needs, now and in the future, just by applying its own ingenuity.
Regardless of whether Bell makes it or not, that is the real lesson of
next week’s announcement.
© 2009 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DC242. Request permission to publish here. |