Dan
Calabrese
Read Dan's bio and previous columns here
December 18, 2008
Newspapers Can Bail
Themselves Out With a Modern Business Model
Many years ago, the late visionary writer Michael Crichton wrote an
op-ed piece that basically predicted everything that has since happened
in the newspaper industry. He talked about how information would be
delivered electronically to people’s own personal devices, and how these
technological advances would render the printed newspaper obsolete.
One of the newspapers that was actually willing to run the piece was my
hometown Detroit News, but it ran a rebuttal alongside from a
staff member who excoriated Crichton for having the gall to say such
things.
The newspaper industry is in financial trouble, not because reporting
and journalism are less valued, but because the business and delivery
model of the industry has already become obsolete. People get their news
from online sources more than any other. And many of those who still
cling to the physical printed newspaper are older people who are doing
so out of habit.
Crichton saw this coming before most people did, but a lot of people saw
it coming soon enough that the newspaper industry could have started
making changes earlier to prepare for the transition of the industry.
At
our house, we still get the Sunday Grand Rapids Press. Here you
might expect the joke that we need something to put the cat litter in.
It’s no joke. That is seriously the only thing we use it for. One Sunday
paper can wrap up one heck of a lot of cat poop.
If
I really want local news, I read the Press online. So does just
about everyone else.
I
suppose it’s a shame, because not four years ago, the Press built
a massive, modern printing press just west of town. It’s a beautiful
building and it makes the print and photo colors in the paper pop better
than ever. A few months before that, I had been invited to the unveiling
of a similar new printing press by the Kalamazoo Gazette.
Both papers were proud of how much better their product would look – and
look better they do. But it doesn’t matter a hill of beans. Most likely,
within five years’ time, almost no one will read a printed, physical
newspaper.
Today, newspapers are enacting deep newsroom layoffs. They are closing
bureaus. They are trying to cover more with less. But they keep running
those shiny new printing presses, determined to get a return on the
investment they made so recently, as if to spit in the face of the
technological headwind and say, “No! People will always want
newspapers!”
If
the Big Three automakers are dying from the “legacy cost” of retiree
health benefits, newspapers are dying from their own legacy costs – the
stately buildings, complex printing facilities and multilevel delivery
operations set up generations ago to serve the only method available at
the time for bringing the written word to their respective communities.
Today, it would probably be cheaper for a newspaper to simply buy every
one of its subscribers a web-enabled laptop and then shut down
everything else. Every dollar spent printing newspapers is a dollar that
could and should have been invested in modern methods of electronic
information delivery – and that includes the employment of excellent
reporters who fill your online news site with information your readers
want and need.
There is talk today that it’s the newspaper industry that really needs a
bailout. Two of my North Star Writers Group colleagues,
Eric Baerren and
Rob Kall, have said as much in recent weeks, with Rob going so far
as to call for a federally funded program to employ investigative
journalists.
I
share their love of the practice of great journalism, but if ever there
was an industry that should be able to sustain itself financially, it is
the news business. It is less costly than ever, at least with respect to
overhead, to report and disseminate news.
What the news business needs is a modern business model. The giant
printing presses can be sold or operated for commercial clients. The
stately old buildings can be leased to other users. The delivery trucks
can be sold to people who can use them more profitably. And all the
savings can be invested in resources for actual writing and reporting.
It
appears the Detroit News has finally admitted Crichton was right.
It announced this week that it is cutting back to only three days’ home
delivery. The other days, a scaled-down print version of the paper will
be available at newsstands. Otherwise, it’s online only.
There will always be a market for good reporting. Newspapers that shed
the burdensome overhead of yesteryear and learn to adapt will do more
than just survive.
© 2008 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DC236. Request permission to publish here. |