April 19, 2006
Too Much Information, Too Little Knowledge
In the mid-1930s, the social commentator and
author E.B. White was invited to observe a
demonstration of a primitive form of
television. His comments afterwards were
prescient. Television, he observed, would
make events happening half a world away from
us as real as those taking place in our own
living rooms. And, he added damningly, "when
we look into another's face, the impression
will be of mere artifice."
Before it had even become a medium, White
understood television's power to dilute,
confuse and cheapen just about everything
touched by its soulless gaze. Not that it
mattered; America was more than ready to
embrace the magical glowing box that would
soon invade virtually every living room from
sea to shining sea. By 1960, it was even
ready to elect "the first television
president," the photogenic and charismatic
John Kennedy, whose poise and charm
contrasted significantly enough with Richard
Nixon's irritability and razor stubble to
land him in the White House.
The ascendance of "the first television
president" worked out well enough, if only
by virtue of its delaying the descent of the
nation into Nixon's clutches by eight years.
Unfortunately, subsequent emergence of other
media has had less favorable results.
It was only after the onset of Bill
Clinton's second term that U.S. Internet
usership achieved critical mass. Seduced by
the siren song of "the next big thing" and
the millions of AOL CDs plopped into their
mailboxes, Americans raced to buy glitchy
modems and to get "wired." And once the
allure of online porn and e-mailed chain
letters had worn away, what was left but the
discussion forum and the online pundit?
Sure, the 'net has proven a marvelous tool.
Now, with a few clicks of the mouse and the
sacrifice of personal credit card
information, we can buy the same worthless
consumer products for which we used to have
to drive to the mall from our own living
rooms, barely budging from our Barcaloungers.
And sure, one is able to find out
something about just about anything
after just a few seconds on Google. But it's
the something that's the problem.
As the saying goes, a little knowledge is a
dangerous thing. And the online world, as
created, processed and assimilated by
television-reared Americans, results in very
little knowledge. The web's very democracy
is also its chief weakness. Internet
information tends to be self-negating, as
each assertion of fact is met with a
contrary one. Gone is the notion of the
shared understanding of any objective truth;
the old arbiters of reality like Walter "and
that's the way it is" Cronkite have been
replaced by a multitude of cranky
self-anointed experts whose perceived
veracity is determined not by any objective
vetting of facts but by hits, links and page
views.
Online, a moron competes with an Einstein as
an equal in an endless global shouting match
where victory, defeat or any ultimate
conclusion is rendered impossible. As a
touchstone, it is instructive to note the
ascendancy of neo-creationism. Only in the
Internet era is it possible for
superstitious twaddle to achieve equal
footing with empirical science, and as
debates in dozens of American states and
classrooms have shown, that is precisely
what has happened. Objective truth has been
supplanted by subjective bombast, which in
turn has come to guide public policy.
Likewise, Goebbels's aphorism that "a lie
repeated often enough becomes the truth" has
shown its practical applicability in regard
to the mythical Iraqi WMDs. Never mind that
they never actually existed. If sufficient
numbers of right-wing reality pimps repeat
the mantra that they do, both popular
opinion and military policy will respond as
if they do.
The brave new info-world has been the
perfect petri dish in which to grow the
adulterated, corrupt culture of
neoconservative Republicanism and its
primary toxin, George W. Bush. A nation
divorced from any objective reality needs a
similarly divorced president, and the
east-coast-bred mock-Texan with the fake
twang and the compulsion to bomb other
nations to rubble for the flimsiest of
reasons - or no reason at all - fits the
bill perfectly. The proverbial million
monkeys have been given their million
typewriters, and have typed their magnum
opus: "ewiophgiownffdb." Their great leader,
appearing on tens of millions of television
and computer screens coast to coast to echo
their clarion call: "ewiophgiownffdb." His
loyal keyboard-armed monkeys repeat: "ewiophgiownffdb."
Down is up. In is out. War is peace.
Ignorance is strength. Now, about those
Iranian nukes.
As Walter Cronkite might say, that's the way
it is.
©
2006 North Star Writers Group. May not
be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DBL011.
Request permission to publish here.