What do you know? It turns out that
George W. Bush has been making his
enemies list and checking it twice,
empowering his flying monkeys in the
FBI and NSA to spy on members of the
long-suffering American peasantry
without going to all the bother of
getting the pesky court-ordered
warrants that the law mandates.
Dangerous terra-ist threats such as
Quaker peace groups, vegan
organizations and llama fur
protesters have been put on notice:
Constitutional protections no longer
apply to you, and Big Brother George
is watching. And - irony of ironies
- who should blow the whistle but
the New York Times?
Yes, in a curious paroxysm of truth
telling, Judy Miller's Times
- Bush's old accomplice in launching
a certain little Mideast war that
has thus far resulted in roughly
130,000 dead - has had its
Come-To-Jesus conversion to
journalistic integrity, evidently
attempting to atone for its WMD-touting
sins. And right around the holiday
season, when one might expect them
to be sending check-stuffed
Christmas cards to the likes of
Armstrong Williams and Jayson Blair,
were their past displays of "ethics"
a reliable roadmap to their current
behavior.
Whatever. The battered, tattered
all-the-news-that-fits Times has dug
itself a deep hole that it now has
to claw its way out of, if it is to
regain a whiff of its long-lost
credibility. Nice that they're not
lying for the moment, I suppose. But
a good lie is so much more
entertaining than the boring old
truth.
Good thing we've still got Dear
Leader pulling his best Pinocchios
for us. The news cycle would be ever
so drab without his belligerent,
stammering defensive forays into the
reality distortion field.
In a starkly comic reprise of the
golden ages of Cointelpro, Nixon's
enemies list and McCarthyism all at
once, Bush has spent the final
farthings of both his political
capital and personal credibility by
a) authorizing illegal spying on
American citizens, then b) lying
about it, then c) inventing
whole-cloth constitutional and legal
justifications for a transparently
impeachable offense. Lies piled upon
lies, all served up atop a heaping
helping of Nixonian dirty tricks.
And live on national television,
too.
Alternating between a belligerent
bellow and a wounded-goat bleat,
Bush blundered through a juvenile
display of denial, blame-shifting,
hypocrisy and adolescent bellicosity
that was mistakenly touted as a
press conference. While Bush
sycophants and handlers such as
Condi Rice and Alberto Gonzales
dispersed far and wide to preach the
curious evangel that it was
righteous, necessary and responsible
for their boss to subvert the
constitution in order to save it, a
flustered and frequently visibly
angry Bush not only refused to atone
for his crime, but publicly resolved
to repeat it. All that was missing
were the words "I am not a crook."
The whole sickly ballet of denial,
diversion and deception seems to
have been plucked whole from the
dark ages of the early 1970s and
deposited square into December 2005
for an encore performance. Were it
not for the fact that Bob Woodward
has gone over to the Dark Side in
the intervening years, it could be
1974 all over again. Here we have a
president and an administration
packed to the gills with imperial
hubris, utterly convinced of their
own divine rectitude even as they
stumble through the wreckage wrought
by five years of Republican lying,
cronyism and corruption. Tom DeLay's
heading for the docket; Duke
Cunningham's heading for prison;
administration acolytes such as Bill
Frist and Conrad Burns are
frantically swatting away swarms of
investigators swirling about them
like wasps.
Meanwhile, closer to home, Jack
Abramoff's slipping beneath the
waves, threatening to drag Karl Rove
and an army of minor congressmen and
bought-and-paid-for Bush-supporting
pundits along with him. All this at
the same time as the Iraq debacle
emerges as the mother of all
quagmires. Wouldn't Tricky Dick feel
right at home?
The five years of fury, bluster and
tales told by idiots that have
marked the current presidency now
seem to be winding towards an
inevitable and bitter end. Whatever
hope George W. Bush ever had of a
viable second term has dissipated
like a white phosphorous cloud, and
the administration has taken to its
battle stations, hurling bogus
accusations, indignant denials and
platitudes in the no-hoper's endgame
of attempting to stave off
inevitable collapse. If precedent
holds true, the next phases should
consist of resignations, indictments
and a circular firing squad of
blame-around-the-rosy wherein
administration flunkies and
congressional animals race each
other do their best to distance
themselves from Bush�s sinking ship.
It ought to be recalled that in the
end, it wasn't his failed war or his
cronies' - specifically, his vice
president's - corruption that led to
Nixon's unraveling; it was spying
and lying. It's an outcome that
George W. Bush seems determined to
repeat.
Mr.
Bush, what did you know, and when did
you know it?