November 30, 2005
Striking a Blow for Buyer's Remorse
Under
normal circumstances, odd-year elections
tend to generate roughly the same level of
popular excitement as an accountant�s
convention. Not that many people typically
get worked up about candidates for
Commissioner of Sewers, obscure bond
proposals and the like; the reasons, of
course, are easy to understand. After a long
day at work, would you rather stand
in line, waiting to punch a card to vote on
issues you only dimly comprehend, or grab
some drive-through and head home for an
evening of reality TV? Under normal
circumstances, America votes with its feet,
and the winners by a landslide are Mickey
D's and the remote.
Not this
year. Not quite. A combination of
factors�variously guessed to include the
Iraqi quagmire, Plamegate, the Federal
non-response to Katrina, corporate
downsizing, and the transit of Mercury
through Scorpio�have led to a relatively
energized off-year electorate. Energized to
the tune of a half-dead Duracell, maybe, but
energized nonetheless. To do what?
Evidently, to send George W. Bush a message:
We Don't Like You Anymore.
A single
year past his one-percent "mandate," George
Bush finds himself the proud recipient of
approval ratings in the mid-thirties, with
one senior aide under indictment and another
only a hair's breadth behind, and with a
large segment of the populace barely
restraining themselves from baying for his
blood. It's a sorry and humbling state of
affairs for Mr. Mission Accomplished, who
only a few short years ago seemed able to
elevate the masses to dizzying heights of
exultation by simply delivering a plastic
turkey to Baghdad, or showing up for a
photo-op in a flightsuit.
Neo-conservatism's golden age now seems as
distant a memory as a first-run episode of
I Love Lucy. The worm has turned, and
with a vengeance: America's noticed that its
lost its job, its co-pay has gone up, and
that the kids down the street are coming
home in boxes, and it isn't happy. At all.
Only
such convulsive angst could explain the
across-the-board Democratic Party gains in
places like New Jersey, Virginia, and
Arizona. With the exception of the
re-election of Republican-lite Mike
Bloomberg as mayor of New York City, the
2005 elections were nearly a Democratic
sweep; Democrats landed John Corzine the
Governorship of New Jersey and Tim Kaine
that of Virginia. Odd, really, considering
that Garden State residents have long been
fed up with state Democratic corruption and
nepotism, and that Kaine's candidacy was
marred by some fairly sleazy tactics (which,
it must be said, his opponent matched note
for note). Democrats didn't win on the
strength of their virtues; they won by
default.
That is,
they won on the strength of being not-Bush.
By being The Other Guy. Had "none of the
above" entered the fray, Corzine and Kaine
would be working on their resumes rather
than calling moving vans.
Over the
coming days, Democratic stalwarts will crow
over this November's repudiation of all
things Republican and happily fantasize
about their chances for retaking the House
and Senate in 2006. And truth be told, they
have good reason to do so: They'll still be
not-Bush a year from now, and there is
little likelihood that Karl Rove's
presidential handpuppet will see any
dramatic upturn in his popular loveability
between now and then. In all likelihood,
Bushian neoconservatism is finished.
More's
the pity, then, that the Democrats aren't
offering anything substantial to replace it.
No clear, coherent Democratic agenda has yet
emerged from the bloated, formless mass
molded by Clinton and McAuliffe. There's no
guiding vision, no governing principle, no
overarching theme apart from simply not
being associated with a certain
semiliterate, boorish incompetent from
Crawford, Texas whose cabal currently runs
the most powerful nation in the world.
A bit of
spine and a dollop of principle would be
nice things to bring to the fray. If the
Democratic party had a few more Conyers,
Reids, or Pelosis, they might even succeed
in generating some actual popular
enthusiasm, a commodity that's been in short
supply for them lately. Thus far, though,
the party as a whole remains as gelatinous
as ever, a party of appeasing platitudes
rather than guiding principles. Being bland,
formless goo might be enough to win
elections, so long as your opponents' leader
is actively loathed. But it's scarcely
sufficient to effectively govern.
©
2005 North Star Writers Group. May not
be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # DBL002.
Request permission to publish here.