Candace
Talmadge
Read Candace's bio and previous columns
October 31, 2008
Green Economy Rises Out
of Financial Sector Ashes
The Sharp Electronics
plant in Memphis, Tennessee produces enough photovoltaic panels each
year to produce 64 megawatts of electricity – sufficient to power 14,000
homes. It is the Japanese company’s only solar panel manufacturing
facility outside of its home country. The plant, formerly used for
television manufacturing that was off-shored to Mexico in 2000, employs
450 workers, 190 of whom are unionized.
Rock Port, Missouri
generates all of its own electricity for its 1,300 residents from the
Loess Hills Wind Farm, which launched in April. Four 1.25-megawatt
Suzlon turbines are expected to generate roughly 16 million kilowatt
hours, some 3 million or 123 percent more than the city actually needs.
The excess power is sold to the Missouri Joint Municipal Electricity
Commission, making Rock Port’s meter run backwards.
The manufacturing wind
also blows in Newton, Iowa. Trinity Structural Towers, a unit of
Dallas-based Trinity Industries, is investing $21 million there to
rework part of a former Maytag manufacturing plant to make wind turbine
towers and employ 140. TPI Composites of Warren, Rhode Island is
building a $56 million, 316,000-square-foot factory to manufacture wind
turbines and should hire 500 workers by 2010.
Enough talk about Wall
Street’s worrisome gyrations. There is good news on the economic
horizon. Not all is doom and dismay. Take heart: The green economy is
rising from the ashes of the financial sector’s greed and folly.
That’s green as in
greenbacks combined with environmental awareness. The country is now
discovering what California has known for decades: Green industries and
policies generate jobs. Between 1977 and 2007, the Golden State’s energy
efficiency policies generated close to 1.5 million jobs while
eliminating fewer than 25,000 jobs, according to a new study by the
Center for Energy, Resources and Economic Sustainability at the
University of California at Berkeley.
Out of California also
comes the Apollo Alliance, its name derived from the
government/private-sector initiative launched by President John. F.
Kennedy in 1961 that put American astronauts on the moon by 1969. Just
like the space mission, the contemporary Apollo Program proposes a large
investment of federal funding over a decade. The new mission: $50
billion annually for 10 years to jumpstart a national clean energy
economy.
Among other goals, the
program calls for doubling the tax-dollar investment in clean energy
research and establishing a National Energy Innovation Fund to invest in
the most promising new technologies to emerge from the expanded
research. It also aims to create jobs through building mass transit and
paying to update the power grid. More U.S.-based jobs would come through
investing in Detroit to build high-efficiency vehicles and by updating
the national roads and other infrastructure improvements. The program
also aims to cut energy use at least 30 percent in new and existing
buildings nationwide and by 20 percent in all existing power plants and
industries by 2025.
It’s wildly ambitious
and expensive, but the cost and risks of doing nothing are far greater.
Instead of bailing out Wall Street failures, this $500 billion
investment will return many times that amount in new jobs (an estimated
5 million) and national savings on energy costs.
Since the first oil
shock of 1973, we as a nation have wasted 35 years we could have spent
reducing our dependence on fossil fuels. We cannot make the same mistake
again. The “drill here, drill now” policies of the Republican ticket
will do absolutely nothing to reduce the inevitable long-term rise in
the price of oil and natural gas. Nor can such outdated policies
guarantee bountiful or even adequate fossil fuels exclusively for this
country, since all oil and natural gas is sold on an international
market regardless of its place of origin.
Once again, after
three-and-a-half decades, we stand at a fork in the road. If we don’t
take the branch marked clean energy efficiency this time, we might not
have an economy or a country in another 35 years.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #CT124.
Request permission to publish here. |