Candace
Talmadge
Read Candace's bio and previous columns
October 20, 2008
It Ain’t Broke, So
Don’t Fix Nebraska’s Safe-Haven Law
Nebraska’s unique,
groundbreaking safe haven law has come under fire for accomplishing
precisely what it was designed to do – keep children of any age
safe from parents or guardians too overwhelmed to care responsibly for
the young lives in their charge.
Naturally, there is
talk already of trying to change it. That would be a huge mistake.
Instead, other states
should take a good long look and then modify their own safe-haven laws
to apply to children of any age, too. Otherwise what they offer in
comparison are discriminatory half-measures that leave older children at
risk. Why should newborns be the only class of minor child to receive
this form of legal protection against injury or death?
Since the law went into
effect in July, 18 children between the ages of one and 17 have been
abandoned, according to the Associated Press. The law permits children
as old as 18 to be left at state-licensed hospitals and also allows
out-of-state parents or guardians to abandon children without reprisal,
provided there is no other evidence of abuse or neglect.
Critics say that none
of the relinquished children was in danger, but how do they know that
for sure? It’s impossible to prove a negative. In other words, we cannot
ever say with any certitude what might have happened to each of these 18
children had this law not provided a humane, sensible way out.
But we certainly can
get an idea of what happens every day in states without the cornhusker
version of a safe-haven law. Just do even a cursory review of all the
heart-rending prosecutions across the country for child abuse and/or
murder. Do we as a society really want to insist that parents or
guardians inflict dire bodily harm on or even kill their offspring
before we are willing to offer an alternative?
Nebraska’s safe-haven
law clearly makes many people uncomfortable. Why is that? Could it be
that this legislation tramples on our social taboos over speaking
frankly about having children and the parent-child relationship? We
assiduously promote a happy fantasy of parents always loving and
nurturing their offspring, who are always supposed to be a blessing and
a bundle of joy.
As the inimitable Ann
Landers used to say, wake up and smell the coffee. Landers, in fact,
conducted a poll on the topic of parenthood back in 1976, and 70 percent
of the more than 10,000 readers who responded to her question said if
they had it to do all over again, they would not have children. What an
unholy stink that survey raised. Haw dare anyone disabuse us of our
cherished denials!
Here are some hard
truths about parenting. All the love in the world and even good
intentions do not automatically equip a person to be a good parent. The
job of parenting is simply not for everyone. And unfortunately some
people do not realize this until they reproduce and then find themselves
way in over their heads. All too often and with tragic consequences they
take it out on their children.
At the same time,
however, no one has the right or wisdom to make the decision about
becoming a parent for another person. This Nebraska law imposes no
mandates. It does not prevent any overwhelmed parent from opting not to
give up a child and instead asking for help. The law simply leaves an
escape route open to children of all ages.
As gut-wrenching as it
can be for both sides, sometimes the best thing a parent can do for a
child is to give up custody of that child. Instead of condemning these
people for not wanting their failings to fall hard on their children, we
might consider what it really means to love and want the best for a
child.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #CT122.
Request permission to publish here. |