Outing . .
. and Whitewashing
In a week
that featured the Democrats’ capturing of both houses of Congress in the
mid-term elections, along with the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld as
Secretary of Defense, the most fascinating media story of the week may
very well have featured a late night comedian, and his clumsy statement
about the sexual orientation of a top party official.
On Nov. 8,
HBO talk show host Bill Maher went on CNN’s “Larry King Live” to discuss
the recently-completed election, and in the course of doing so brought
up what he feels is the hypocrisy of Republicans campaigning for
anti-gay public policy. Why is it hypocritical? Because, Maher, said,
many of the Republican leaders are themselves gay.
common argument, made even more often lately due to the revelations
about disgraced Congressman Mark Foley, as well as Pastor Ted Haggard,
the Colorado-based evangelical who was close with the White House. But
on the King show, Maher named a different Republican: Ken Mehlman, the
chairman of the Republican National Committee. Then he vowed that, on
his own show two days later, he would name more closeted gay
happened next was a bit of a surprise. King replied that he had never
heard such a thing about Mehlman. CNN deleted the entire exchange from
future airings of the program, and expunged the line from the episode’s
transcript on its website. And when the segment inevitably popped up on
YouTube, CNN’s lawyers demanded it be taken down — for “copyright
infringement” reasons, they claimed.
meanwhile, did not follow through on his threat to name others on his
show, nor did he make any mention of the flap at all. I’m guessing Time
Warner’s lawyers gave him a talking-to prior to the show (TW owns both
CNN and HBO). Even more strangely, the news media has essentially
ignored the flap, with only various blogs and the gay press reporting on
it. The only major newspapers to cover it appear to be the New York
Post and Seattle Times. The New York Times reported on
the story Monday but did not mention Mehlman’s name.
Mehlman gay? I haven’t the slightest idea. Rumors to that effect have
certainly been out there for quite some time, but he has always denied
them. I suppose it is possible that he is suffering from a Seinfeldian
case of mistaken identity, not that there’s anything wrong with that. (Mehlman,
for what it’s worth, announced the day after the King show aired that he
is stepping down from his post in January, though that move likely has
more to do with the expiration of his two-year term, and the Republican
election losses, than anything related to the Maher interview.)
course, is the former host of “Politically Incorrect,” who has based his
career on being exactly that. He is perhaps best known for being,
essentially, fired by ABC for going on the air a few days after the 9/11
attacks and stating that the terrorists were not cowards. Maher’s show
always has lively debate – much more lively than the essentially staged
contests seen nightly on the cable news shows. The debate also goes
places that other shows don’t –the outing issue being one example.
essentially invented by the AIDS activism group ACT-UP, who believed
that Reagan-era government officials refusing to stand up for government
action were guilty of perpetuating the AIDS epidemic itself. The tactic
has made a comeback in the Bush era, especially as Republicans have
pursued anti-gay marriage legislation, and the Internet and blogs have
made it easier to transmit information to the public.
I find the
tactic of outing distasteful, especially in doing so to one’s political
opponents. For one thing, it is wrong to decry the politics of personal
destruction when, say, the Republicans are doing it to Bill Clinton, but
then to turn around and toss the same thing at the other side. I also
find it nothing short of un-American for any of us to speak to what
anyone else’s political views “should” be.
I don’t believe it is right for the media — or, for that matter, Maher
— to report on the sexual orientation of public figures. But once it has
happened, I believe it is even more inappropriate and unethical for
media organizations such as CNN to rewrite history, alter program
transcripts, and pretend as though something wasn’t said when it was. If
the network feels that what Maher said was wrong, why didn’t they merely
apologize for it? Why airbrush their own archives instead?
And as for
the question of whether Maher, or CNN, has committed “libel” by
suggesting Mehlman is gay – does that not make being gay into something
much more sinister than it actually is?
feedback on this column,
© 2006 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
is Column # SS17.
Request permission to publish here.