August 20, 2007
Aftereffects of the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse
The most shocking
thing, to me, is all the survivors. When I first heard that the I-35W
Bridge collapsed in downtown Minneapolis in the middle of the evening
rush hour on August 1, sending cars into the Mississippi River below I
assumed to later hear about a death toll in the hundreds. In fact, two
weeks after the collapse, there were only 11 confirmed dead, with two
more bodies not yet found.
As a native of the Minneapolis area, this tragedy hits especially close
to home for me, even though I didn't know anyone who was on or near the
bridge. I had been on the bridge dozens of times, including once last
year when my father and I gave my wife's father, grandfather and
brother-in-law a tour of the Twin Cities.
The first responders and police in Minneapolis, as well as the city and
state government, deserve credit for their handling of the situation,
which saved many lives. We've seen what happens when a disaster is met
by incompetent leadership at every level, so credit is due to those who
did their jobs in an exemplary manner that day.
Two weeks after the tragedy, it remains unclear what exactly caused the
collapse, and likely will continue to be so for quite some time. But
that hasn't stopped what we've seen with just about every American
calamity of the past couple decades the intrusion of politics into
tragedy, and the tragedy being used as an excuse for political
Many liberals reacted by blaming the collapse, on some level, on the
Republican culture of small government, which put tax cuts ahead of
necessary government spending. Conservatives, meanwhile, reacted
incredulously, with the usual "how dare you blame everything on Bush,
and invoke politics at a time like this!" (To some on the right, alas,
it's always "a time like this.")
With Minnesota's baseball team, the Twins, scheduled to break ground
that morning on a new downtown ballpark, those morally opposed to
publicly financed sports venues were handed a propaganda victory. After
all, what's the state doing committing $400 million in public money when
our bridges are falling apart? Meanwhile, the question of rebuilding
quickly devolved into yet another argument over whether union labor
would be used for the work, and whether the pro- or anti-union side was
"holding up the project" by not immediately caving.
There's no question that infrastructure spending has been one of the
more prominent of the many casualties necessitated by the conservative
governance of the past seven years. But that's even more true in
Minnesota, as GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty has been much more of a fiscal
hardliner than President Bush has ever pretended to be.
Rather than embracing the Grover Norquist idea of "starving the beast"
of government, the presidents fiscal philosophy has been to counter
liberal "tax and spend" policy with the even-more-controversial policy
of "spend, but don't tax."
Conservative Republican governors such as Pawlenty, on the other hand,
are handcuffed both by state laws requiring balanced budgets, and
ideological mandates to cut taxes drastically and cut spending even more
drastically than that. Pawlenty, indeed, either vetoed or threatened to
veto more than $7 billion of infrastructure improvements in the last few
years as governor.
However, none of these matters of public spending is a clear either/or.
And besides, even if we had a state or federal government in which
elected officials said yes to everything and money was no object, that
doesn't guarantee the bridge wouldn't have still collapsed. It's not
like anyone has stepped forward to say "Yes, I noticed that exact
problem and asked it to be fixed, and the government said No. Why
didn't they listen to me?"
Pawlenty, meanwhile, before the bodies were so much as out of the water,
has already begun rushing plans for reconstruction, with the names of
contractors already being floated. Minneapolis/St. Paul just happens to
be hosting the Republican convention next summer, and bridge
construction either already completed or well underway would certainly
mark a political and PR victory for both Pawlenty and the party.
The governor denies any connection, but if he really is putting his own
political interests ahead of respect for the victims and the safety of
the new bridge, it would be the biggest howler of its kind since . . .
well, since the last Republican convention, which was planned for New
York just days before the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
At any rate, even a determined effort to get the bridge built by next
year would likely fail. I know from my wife, a civil engineer who
designs and inspects bridges, that design, engineering, and construction
delays on bridges are commonplace, and rarely (if ever) are they built
on time especially huge, high-traffic bridges like the one to be built
in Minneapolis. If the new bridge is completed before 2010, I'll be
So where does Minnesota go from here? The state should take every
precaution in figuring out what happened to cause the collapse, and to
make sure the new bridge built in its place is safely and expertly
built, without regard to the timing of elections or political
conventions. Minnesota is lucky to have lost so few people in the
tragedy. What's important now is to honor the memory of those who lost
their lives by rebuilding in an honorable way.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
This is Column #
Request permission to publish here.