July 23,
2007
Methinks
Bill O’Reilly Doth Condemn Too Much
A dispute
last week between Bill O’Reilly and JetBlue over the latter’s
sponsorship of the upcoming YearlyKos blogging convention shows us quite
a bit about the modern-day conservative mind – most notably, the
frequent use of straw men to obfuscate attention to America’s real
problems.
Some
background: the left-wing blogging community DailyKos is planning its
upcoming YearlyKos convention in Chicago in early August. The airline
JetBlue has agreed to sponsor the event, which in its inaugural
incarnation in Las Vegas last summer drew several presidential
candidates, and this year’s event is scheduled to feature Nancy Pelosi,
Harry Reid, Rahm Emanuel and several Democratic presidential candidates.
This
decision by JetBlue has led to a torrent of righteous indignation among
conservative bloggers and right-leaning cable news panelists, who used
the occasion to cherry-pick various quotes from the blog to show just
how extreme these people are. Bill O’Reilly, for instance, has said the
site “rivals the KKK and Nazis,” and even sent a reporter to ambush
JetBlue CEO David Barger at his home and ask him about certain “extreme”
quotes that appeared on the site. (For someone so opposed to Michael
Moore, O’Reilly seems to have embraced one of his most common tactics.)
JetBlue
eventually relented and agreed to drop its advertising from the
YearlyKos web site. O’Reilly’s fans, meanwhile, responded to the
“hatefulness” and “extremism” of the Kos site by leaving comments
telling its members to “Hurry
up and die,”
and comparing them
to “a commie slime maggot born from Karl Marx’s rotting
feces.”
I come not
to defend DailyKos, but rather to bury those smearing it. The DailyKos
blog, for those unfamiliar with it, is the most heavily trafficked of
the left-wing blogs, with hundreds of regular posters and many more
commenters than that. The blog has participated in fundraising for
Democratic candidates.
I’m not a
user or a particular fan of the Daily Kos community. The group is
considerably to my left, and I don’t generally agree that their
prescription for the country is the best thing. But anyone who knows
anything about the Internet – especially a large operation like Daily
Kos – knows that if thousands of people are posting a day, some nutters
are going to get through. And the most extreme thoughts of said nutters,
once they have been cherry-picked, should not be seen as the
institutional opinion of the whole operation.
How much
responsibility do political partisans have to condemn the outrageous
comments made by some associated with them? This question, in fact, has
apparently become Sean Hannity’s primary source of material in recent
months. Virtually every liberal guest who has appeared on “Hannity and
Colmes” or Hannity’s radio show this year has had to answer questions
about some outrageous comment – usually by an obscure blogger or college
professor – and whether they will condemn these vicious, hateful
remarks. If the guest condemns them, he’s throwing his own party under
the bus. If he doesn’t, he’s being extreme. If he refuses to answer,
he’s being “evasive.”
After Ann
Coulter said she “hopes the terrorists kill” John Edwards, Hannity and
guest Brent Bozell changed the subject to “liberal hypocrisy” because a
liberal blogger named Hart Williams had called for the murder of
conservative musician Ted Nugent, and that “no liberal has condemned
him.”
Why hadn’t
they? Probably because while Ann Coulter is a major media figure who
appears on television almost nightly, Hart Williams is an obscure
blogger who I’d imagine most liberals had never even heard of. The
reason they hadn’t condemned him was because they were simply unaware of
him. Perhaps O'Reilly, Hannity and Bozell would be happy if every
liberal in the country helpfully issued a list, every morning, of every
other liberal he wished to condemn.
I've written before just how stupid it is to argue over whether one
political side or the other has more crazy people in it. If, say, 10
percent of Democrats and 12 percent of Republicans are crazy, do the
Democrats then “win”?
Perhaps it is best to judge political and media figures first and
foremost by what they themselves say, and not by whom they have or have
not condemned.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column #
SS052.
Request permission to publish here.
|