April 23, 2007
Virginia Tech Massacre
Brings Out the Axe-Grinders
Last week, America once again saw unspeakable tragedy, in a decade that
has already seen much too much of it. Cho Seung-Hui, a student at
Virginia Tech, opened fire on campus in two separate incidents, killing
more than 30 people and injuring dozens more, before turning the gun on
America's reaction has been one of caring, of outrage and of
introspection. But we're also seeing an uglier reaction, one that's all
too familiar from events past – the rush of everyone with a political
axe to grind to appropriate the tragedy for their own ideological
We saw all of this already, of course, with the Columbine massacre,
which occurred almost eight years to the day prior to the Virginia Tech
killings. Before the 15 dead bodies in that Colorado high school were
even cold, virtually every American with a preconceived agenda blamed
the incident on his or her most convenient enemy.
Gun control advocates blamed the NRA, while gun-control opponents blamed
the lack of guns to use in self-defense. Those who criticize Hollywood,
the music industry and video games used Columbine as an argument against
. . . Hollywood, the music industry and video games. A theory emerged
that the date of the massacre (April 20) indicated a Nazi pedigree for
the killers because it was Hitler's birthday, ignoring the more likely
explanation that they had chosen the day of the "420" pot-smoking
Anti-war activists claimed U.S. participation in NATO's bombing of
Kosovo at the time gave carte blanche to random violence, even though
that intervention was to prevent a campaign of ethnic cleansing and
genocide. Others, stretching even further, claimed that the impeachment
of President Clinton a few months earlier had created an adversarial
climate. And in the biggest stretch of all, a member of a Jewish
discussion listserv on which I participated argued that Dylan Kleibold,
one of the killers, had been given a "poor cultural outlook" because his
mother didn't raise him as a Jew.
This mentality hit a low point three years later in Michael Moore's
loathsome 2002 documentary "Bowling For Columbine," which started off by
arguing how ridiculous it was to blame video games and Marilyn Manson
for the massacre, before turning around and blaming it on Charlton
Heston, the war in Kosovo, the military-industrial complex and American
culture and character in general. The problem with America, Moore's film
concluded, was all those damn Americans. (A much better film about
Columbine, Gus Van Sant's 2003 drama Elephant, hinted at pretty
much all of the above before, smartly, drawing absolutely no "why"
So after Blacksburg, history repeats itself again, as everyone with an
ax to grind has grinded it once more.
Both sides of the largely-dormant gun debate have once again manned
their battle stations, with both sides losing sight of the likely fact
that neither universal gun ownership nor a complete ban on firearms
would be likely to put an end to mass murders, or even murder in
But that's not all: When it got out that the killer was an immigrant
from East Asia, it suddenly emboldened America's large anti-immigrant
faction (even though Cho was an American citizen and not an
illegal alien). And when the mysterious phrase "Ismail Ax" was found to
be tattooed on the shooter's arm, all those who feared (read: "hoped
with every fiber of their being") that the killer would be a Muslim got
their moment in the sun. Never mind that the phrase has yet to be
explained, that there is nothing whatsoever in Cho's background that
suggests anything Islamic, or that he compared himself to Jesus in some
of his writings.
By the end of the week, the story shifted focus, as it usually does, to
the media. At issue mostly has been NBC's decision to broadcast videos
and photographs that Cho sent them prior to his death. Whether the
network was right is certainly questionable, although I tend to believe
the content was newsworthy and therefore suitable for broadcast.
And I don't get the idea that such a thing "rewards" the killer. First
of all, he's dead, and he never even saw it. Secondly, is anyone really
going to react to this by saying "Gee, I wasn't going to go on a massive
killing rampage, but now that this guy did and he got on TV, maybe I
will"? Of course not.
The sad thing is that mass killings are like terrorism in that there is
no legislative or policy prescription that could eradicate it
The blame for the killings at Virginia Tech last week should fall
squarely on the shoulders of Cho Seung-Hui, not guns, not lack of guns,
and not the war in Iraq or George Bush or Bill Clinton or Don Imus. It
is best to keep the focus on those who died and remember them – not to
use the tragedy as a jumping off point to make a political argument.
© 2007 North Star Writers
Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
is Column # SS040.
Request permission to publish here.