February 8, 2006
What is Peaceful, or Motherly, About
the 'Peace Mom'?
When your
son’s death is your claim to fame, then at the very least red flags
should start going up. When you gain your popularity through ardent
opposition of what your son gave his life fighting for, then it is no
longer simply a flag – it is a blatant insult and an abuse of a hero’s
memory.
Not many
people are capable of disrespecting their son’s sacrifices like Cindy
Sheehan has. Surely many members of the over 2,000 families that have
suffered losses in Iraq have strong reservations about the war in that
country, but they do not utilize the blood of their relatives to author
books, speak to the cameras or gain national attention. Cindy Sheehan is
not an example of a soldier’s mom, or even that of a “peace mom”. She is
the exception.
Cindy
Sheehan is not peaceful, and only arguably a mother. Labeling the
savages that killed her son and that continue to slaughter Iraqi
children “freedom fighters,” she has lost any credibility she had with
any reasonable American that once sympathized with her over the death of
her son Casey. Her words come in addition to her repeated arrests at
increasingly aggressive demonstrations she has starred in, after a
supposedly peaceful start outside President Bush’s ranch in Crawford,
Texas.
In her most
recent publicity stunt, Sheehan exposed a t-shirt with a blatant
anti-war message on it as she sat in the House gallery while waiting for
President Bush’s State of the Union address. Not surprisingly, she had
been invited as a guest by California Democrat Representative Lynn
Woolsey, who has called for the creation of a Department of Peace.
(Somehow, I have a hard time believing that this is the type of
Department that would have won us World War I, World War II or the Gulf
War, but it would have made us friends with multicultural dictators
everywhere!)
As a result
of what seemed to be a violation of a law forbidding such behavior on
Capitol grounds, Capitol forces appropriately asked Sheehan to cover up
the shirt, which she explicitly refused to do. Only then was she taken
out and held for a few hours on minor charges. Interestingly, or rather,
asininely, Beverly Young, wife of veteran Florida Republican Congressman
Bill Young, was also ejected from the House Gallery for wearing a shirt
that offensively read, you guessed it, “Support the Troops.” If these
three words are truly considered a political statement these days, then
we have a very serious problem on our hands.
One might
argue, “But, her son died in that war. Does she not have the moral right
to protest its continuation?” The answer is, of course she does. She is
completely wrong about withdrawing U.S. troops in the region, and she
would be putting the world in severe danger, yet she surely has the
right to express her opinion. While they detract from her message and
raise suspicions about her motives, illegal actions and shameless
self-promotion are ones we can temporarily endure, however barely.
But
clearly, Sheehan has demonstrated that the Iraq War and her son’s memory
are not exactly the main objects on her mind. On a visit to Venezuela
sponsored by the country’s foreign ministry, Casey’s mother noted she
admires anti-American Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez “for his resolve
against my government and its meddling.” She later stood by Chavez as he
proudly declared, “Enough already with the imperialist aggression. Down
with the U.S. regime.”
Before
leaving Venezuela, Sheehan made sure to invite Chavez to pitch a protest
tent with her in front of President Bush’s residence in Texas. It has
become clear that this woman’s objective no longer revolves around
preventing the deaths of Americans like her son. Instead, she is
utilizing a family tragedy as an incredibly effective political vehicle
– effective, at least, until it became obvious that she was not the
“peace mom” she has attempted to portray herself as.
If so, why
would she take a position, as she did, on the confirmation of Samuel
Alito to the Supreme Court? How does her call for President Bush’s
impeachment over the NSA’s wiretaps of suspected terrorists lead to the
protection of her son’s fellow soldiers? As if these were not strong
indicators that Sheehan has joined and championed the politics of the
far Left in the country, one need only watch as she seriously considers
whether she will electorally challenge liberal California Senator and
Bush opponent Dianne Feinstein for supposedly being out of touch with
her constituents on the Iraq War.
Interestingly, Sheehan put forth the idea while in Venezuela, in the
middle of an anti-globalization demonstration. After she came back from
that trip, she began sounding increasingly like Chavez, who recently
asserted that President Bush is worse than Hitler. Oh, right, Sheehan
only suggested that Bush is 10 times worse than Osama Bin Laden. Whew.
What is
Casey, watching from Heaven, thinking about his mother’s actions? It’s
apparent that she has forgotten about him and the cause that has gotten
her international attention in the first place, and he might have become
desensitized to that. But Sheehan is doing ever more serious damage by
standing next to anti-American Hugo Chavez, calling terrorists in Iraq
“freedom fighters,” and alleging that the U.S. Commander-in-Chief is
worse than Bin Laden. Is this really going to help the survival of our
troops putting their lives on the line every day?
Sheehan’s
actions demoralize our men and women, and embolden terrorists. So much
for contributing peace through victory, and you can say goodbye to the
“peace” label, Cindy. As for your status as a mother, well, it is up to
Casey to determine whether he is still proud to call you “mom.” I know I
wouldn’t be.
© 2006 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI6.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|