September 27, 2006
History’s Nicest Imperialist Power
Sometimes, while in the midst of planning the most efficient ways to
warm up the globe, increase the wage gap and starve even more Africans
and Latin Americans to death, my right-wing conspiratorial mind wanders
off into (soon to be conquered) space. Lately I’ve been particularly
distracted by the behavior of the United States toward some of our worst
enemies, and it just makes me think: For an imperialist, hegemonic power
led by the devil himself, we’re really not that bad.
In
recent weeks, our country has hosted the Iranian and Venezuelan
presidents, as well as a former Iranian president, whose independent
visit we can’t even justify with the United Nations excuse. They are not
particularly our best friends, after all, we are facing a possible
nuclear standoff with one and a revival in Latin American socialist
populism with the other. Yet despite these not-so-slight conflicts, we
allow such individuals to come into our country and tell us, in some of
the toughest language possible, the precise ways in which we are evil.
On the
eve of the fifth anniversary of the September 11th attacks,
Mohammad Khatami, the former president of Iran, spoke at Harvard
University on the “Ethics of Tolerance in the Age of Violence.” Khatami
also got to speak at the National Cathedral. That’s right. The former
president of a country that is developing nuclear weapons in an obvious
attempt to confront the United States, as well as one that is helping to
sow discord and kill American troops in Iraq, was invited to come speak
at the most prestigious university, as well as at the most recognizable
religious landmark, in the country. And of all things, he spoke on the
Ethics of Tolerance.
Whether it was the same tolerance he showed young Iranian liberals he
did not say, but it was the kind of tolerance that is apparently
satisfactory to Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of
Government. But really, when President Bush’s term ends in 2009, what is
the likelihood that he will be invited to speak at the top university in
Iran, much less the holiest Mosque in that country? Would the government
provide for his protection, as we did for Khatami, or would they capture
him and settle for Iranian due process/decapitation?
Soon
thereafter, the United States saw Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and
Venezuelan boss Hugo Chavez, newfound friends united by nothing but
their abhorrence of America, descend upon our nation’s favorite city,
enjoying it as a podium for anti-American ideologies.
Chavez
even used a New York church for his anti-Bush tirade, and repeatedly
referenced academic Noam Chomsky’s book on America’s imperialist evils.
Calling Bush the devil, the socialist chief had no problem using his
visibility in New York to further promote his sought-after position as
leader of the unlikely Venezuelan-Iranian-Syrian-Cuban axis of
anti-Americanism. Upon returning home, he insisted that President Bush
now wanted to kill him for calling him the “devil.”
But
that’s the thing. We don’t do that. In fact, when religious leader Pat
Robertson dared mention the idea of taking Chavez out, he himself got
politically obliterated. What kind of empire has so strongly criticized
one of its citizens for suggesting the assassination of an increasingly
worrisome enemy leader?
What
kind of hegemonic power hosts enemy officials, both within and without
the context of diplomatic necessity? This is, of course, not to mention
giving them some of the nation’s most prestigious forums and holiest
podiums. What kind of state, led by a dangerous, devilish dictator,
actually provides the case, rhetoric and texts that are widely used
against it? Noam Chomsky’s anti-American work reached the top spot in
Amazon.com sales following Chavez’s plug. Did we throw Chomsky in jail
and burn his books?
The
fact of the matter is, never has a state with so much power behaved so
humbly, or nicely, toward others, including its worst enemies. The fact
that the issue of how good we should be to terrorists – who spend their
lives attempting to annihilate us – seriously divides our Congress is a
pretty good indication that we have something new here. Empire or not,
we are the most tolerant, and the most civilized superpower in history –
and we are proud of it. So fine, let them speak at our best
institutions, and let them try to use our country against us. Nothing
can better demonstrate our superiority in the battle of ideologies.
Either way, it is a battle we are going to win.
© 2006 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI23.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|