May 14, 2007
Time for Al Sharpton to
Sink Into Irrelevance
The hypocrisy has struck once again. Barely weeks after hanging Don
Imus’s scalp on his wall of self-importance, Al Sharpton has again
blundered far more egregiously than his own victims.
Sharpton said last week in reference to Mitt
Romney: “As for the one Mormon running for office, those who really
believe in God will defeat him anyways, so don't worry about that;
that's a temporary situation.”
Naturally,
Romney was displeased with the comment implying that he and his fellow
Mormons do not believe in God. Yet Sharpton still refuses to apologize
to him, the primary target of the cutting remarks. He did, however, make
a statement directed to the Mormon community, trying to make it pass for
an apology:
“If . . . any member of the Mormon Church was inadvertently harmed or
bothered or in any way aggrieved because of the distortion of my words
or the lack of clarity of my words, they have my sincere apology.”
Thank you, Reverend Sharpton, for apologizing on behalf of those who
“distorted” your words. Now are you ever going to apologize for your own
mistakes?
For months, Sharpton was an active participant in the destruction of the
reputation of three white Duke University lacrosse players who were
wrongfully accused of raping and assaulting a young black woman. For
months, he sided unequivocally with Crystal Gail Mangum, the “victim”
who fabricated the story, and with Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong,
who is in danger of losing his career for his behavior in the case.
Although these two came out humiliated once the players’ innocence was
established, Sharpton was untouched and refused to apologize, despite
his role in ruining the lives of the three players.
For some reason, the man is still out there, as active and prominent as
ever. The Tawana Brawley controversy, the Crown Heights riot and the
Freddie’s Fashion Mart events should have each independently sufficed in
ending Sharpton’s career, but they have not. The same goes for the Duke
lacrosse case. Yet instead of staying out of the public eye, he battles
on. Worst of all, the media and the politicians give him the green light
for it.
Sharpton called for Rush Limbaugh to be fired from ESPN after his
relatively inconsequential comments about the media’s perception of
Donovan McNabb’s skills. He insisted that Imus be fired for making one
inappropriate comment, despite Imus’s sincere apology to the women
affected and his attempts to reach out to Sharpton. If Imus’s career has
ended for insulting a few women, shouldn’t Sharpton also disappear from
the cameras and lose America’s respect for so seriously insulting an
entire religion?
To
make matters even worse, not only has Sharpton issued a poor,
quasi-apology to the Mormon community and refused to apologize to
Romney, but he, in fact, proceeded to exacerbate the situation by
reinventing it as a civil rights issue. Instead of taking responsibility
for his behavior, Sharpton has turned himself into the victim. He has
now deflected the attention from himself by complaining that the Mormon
Church did not accept blacks until only a few decades ago:
“If
prior to ‘65, ‘78, whenever it was, they did not see blacks as equal, I
do not believe that as real worshipers of God, because I do not believe
God distinguishes between people. That’s not bigotry. That’s responding
to their bigotry.”
So, not only do Mormons not believe in God, but they are now part of a
denomination based on racism. What was that “apology” for again, Al?
Al Sharpton has made his career off the backs of genuine victims who
were wrongly dragged into the national spotlight – such as the Rutgers
women’s basketball team, or alternatively, victims he invented for
publicity, including most recently
Crystal Gail Mangum. In
the former cases he is a hypocrite and an opportunist, and in the latter
situations he is unethical, genuinely harmful and habitually refuses to
apologize. Why is he seen as a spokesman for the black community? Why is
he a leader for anyone?
He
should be irrelevant. To many of us, he already is. Keeping him off the
air and out of the news pages would go a long way in allowing a real
debate about the issues on the one hand, and a faster national racial
reconciliation on the other.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI052.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|