April 23, 2007
Harry Reid’s
Declaration of Defeat in Iraq
Criticism of the Iraq War is one thing. Having Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid announce that the war has been lost is quite another. Reid
waited for an agonizingly bloody day in Iraq that saw many deaths and
seized on it as proof that the recent troop surge is not working. His
words come only weeks after Democrats attached funding for peanuts,
spinach, and other pork to a bill supposed to help our troops get the
job done in Iraq.
Now, the Democrats refuse to fund our troops without setting a date for
retreat in Iraq. Never mind that, originally, top Democrats strongly
supported the invasion of Iraq, or that many of them more recently
pushed for a troop surge until President Bush came to agree with them on
that issue. Regardless of any American’s position on the 2003 decision
to go to war, a withdrawal anytime soon would be calamitous.
Although Iraq seems in bad shape now, the situation there could
certainly be much, much worse. Upon a U.S. withdrawal, Iraq’s government
would collapse, the army would disintegrate into a multitude of
factions, and each neighborhood, city and province would be ruled by
militias. The economy, which today is actually booming despite popular
belief, would come to a halt, further deepening the populace in poverty
and desperation.
Iraq would become a haven for terrorists, and a playground
for Al Qaeda, Iran, Syria and the Gulf states, each forcing their way
into a position of power. This is all not to mention that every single
American life lost would have gone to waste, or that the billions of
American dollars spent in Iraq would now be working to weaken the United
States and kill more of its innocents.
One would hope that since the Democrats were capable enough to get voted
into power, they must be competent to the point of understanding and
absorbing the reality that would follow a U.S. withdrawal. But in that
case why would they still advocate for such a move? Is it possible that
they know that Bush would ignore them, and are hence behaving in such a
manner for the purpose of appeasing their anti-war base? Perhaps.
Yet if that is the case, their actions are still unacceptable. It is
normal for a political party out of power to complain that taxes are too
high, that education is too poorly funded, or that health care is
inadequate, in an attempt to win public favor – regardless of whether
that party would actually change things if in power. In relative terms,
such bickering is not that harmful. Falsely announcing that your country
has lost a war, however, is a much more severe matter. This is precisely
what the Democratic leadership, the party out of power on war policy, is
doing. And it is nothing short of deadly.
For one, statements such as Reid’s do an excellent job of exciting the
terrorists in Iraq. Those radicals operating on the ground in Baghdad
are now facing a new U.S.-Iraqi campaign that could very well represent
the end of their activities. The troop surge and the campaign should be
demoralizing enough for them to halt their activities, if, that is, they
are convinced that these forces are here to stay. But when leaders such
as Reid decide to make such outlandish statements, the terrorists take
heart in the possibility that the U.S. would be forced out soon – in
which case they have no incentive to run, hide and assimilate into
civilized society.
Reid’s words are also an insult to the American men and women serving in
Iraq. What could be more demoralizing than your Senate Majority Leader
informing you that you are risking your life on a daily basis for a war
that has already been lost? Surely, the harmful impact of such a
statement would be mitigated if the war was actually lost. But when the
generals announce that sectarian murders in Baghdad have been cut by
half, and that security has much improved, in merely the opening stages
of the new campaign to secure Baghdad, Reid’s comments are purely
revolting.
We
cannot underestimate the power of the actions of the Democratic
leadership. One Iranian news website, which describes its vision “to
break the global media stranglehold of western outlets,” proudly
published Reid’s comments soon after he made them. Sadly, the reporting
did not even have to be biased to have an outcome agreeable to the
Iranians. The statement has not been lost on Al Qaeda and other
terrorist groups in Iraq, either. And it has certainly not been lost on
our heroes in uniform as they enter yet another long, scorching summer
in Iraq.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI049.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|