March 12,
2007
Academia’s
Passion for Superficial Diversity
Every year,
higher academia becomes increasingly riddled with problems pertaining to
political imbalance, ideological extremes and sometimes outright
ludicrousness. In recent months and years we have heard about a
decades-old cross being removed from a Christian chapel at William and
Mary, about Harvard’s former president being savagely assaulted by his
community for daring to speak up on innate differences between men and
women and about the vast collection of university professors all around
the country who hold outrageous, often borderline treasonous, views of
their own country – the United States.
These
events are neither random nor coincidental. They are part of higher
academia’s seemingly unstoppable move into an era of supposed
progressivism that highlights political correctness as, for all intents
and purposes, a religion. Such political correctness has infiltrated
every part of the American campus, with the rare holdouts being the
oftentimes vastly outnumbered conservative student groups and the
occasional fraternity.
One of the
major ways in which this political correctness is being expressed is
through obsessive focus on diversity. We’re not talking about diversity
of thought or experience here – diversity to the new campus elite
signifies differences in gender, skin color and sexual orientation. No
college brochure is sent to high school students these days unless it
has a prominent picture showing a backpack-donning black female talking
to an Asian male, with a Hispanic student and Native American homosexual
high-fiving each other in the background. This form of diversity is
considered an asset, and is sold as such, by university administrators
all around the country.
The
National Association of Scholars has released a study of university
websites that demonstrates academia’s astonishing passion for
superficial diversity. The study found that on the websites of the top
100 schools in the U.S. News and World Report rankings,
references to diversity far exceed references to the time-honored
concepts of American freedom, liberty, equality and democracy. This
emphasis on diversity is unique to universities, as all other
institutions (such as political parties, religious institutions,
television and even labor unions) continue to lean heavily toward the
traditional American ideals and away from the progressive obsession with
diversity.
Upon
hearing of this study, I decided to track the website of Cornell
University, my alma mater. Most prominent on the website is a big
picture that changes at every visit of the site, usually showing one or
a handful of students participating in some form of activity. As
expected, the website’s presentation of the student body was a gross
misrepresentation of the school’s demographics. On one of my visits to
the site, the pictures showed a total of eight students, all minorities,
with seven of them being women. For reference purposes, Cornell is split down the middle gender-wise, with
blacks making up five percent of the student population.
This was no
coincidence. Every other visit to the site showed carefully calculated
misrepresentations of the nature of the student body. These shallow
forms of diversity, particularly the diversity of skin color, are what
Cornell wanted to the world to see. The fact that the administration
goes out of its way to minimize the spotlight on white males and
highlight the presence of blacks and females shows neither considerate
behavior nor good public relations skills. It is nothing but a
demonstration of the school’s insecurities, and the administration’s
attempt to prove to the world that is not racist, over and over again.
There are
many forms of diversity that are both lacking on America’s campuses and
that simultaneously supersede skin color and gender in importance.
Ideological and intellectual diversity is by definition an integral part
of growing and learning. A student will learn much more about the world
if his thoughts are challenged and if he is compelled to effectively
defend his views. This same student will learn much less from a racially
diverse faculty and student body who all see the world in the exact same
way. Yet the political elite with the decision-making power in American
universities is willing to overlook these facts for the sake of the
immediate pleasure of self-righteousness. So much for diversity of
thought.
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.
© 2007 North Star
Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This is Column # PI43.
Request permission to publish here.
|
|
|